Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05077-03
Original file (05077-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  C O R R E C T I O N  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

WASHINGTON  D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  5077-03 
29 July 2003 

This is in  reference to your  application for correction of  your naval record  pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval Records, sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on 29 July 2003.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof,  your naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found  that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or 
injustice.  Your  Final Multiple Score (FMS) of  144.06 minus .25 for the additional 6 months 
time in  rate would give you  a FMS of 143.81 to be applied to the September 2002 Exam  for 
consideration for advancement.  Individuals who were selectees from the September 2002 Exam 
had  to meet  a FMS  of 146.69.  You  missed  the Final Multiple Cut by  2.88.  Accordingly, your 
application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of  the members of  the panel  will be furnished 
upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01164-02

    Original file (01164-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCCl:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03

    Original file (03834-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05

    Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03109-03

    Original file (03109-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06624-02

    Original file (06624-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05079-02

    Original file (05079-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01165-02

    Original file (01165-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00997-02

    Original file (00997-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an i~ijustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10946-02

    Original file (10946-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10489-02

    Original file (10489-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. .25 for the additional 6 months time in rate Your Final Multiple Score (FMS) of 176.36 minus would give you a FMS of 176.11 to be applied to the March 2002 Exam for consideration for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...