Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06323-03
Original file (06323-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ecb
Docket No: 6323-03
28 October 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 28 October 2003.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser
 
attached.

32/06068  dated 20 October 2003, a copy of which is

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has   been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 

32/-a

O e 

OCT 2003

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR REQUEST ICO

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

(1) BCNR Docket Nr.  

06323-03

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
applicants are responsible for providing the recruiter with
required documents for advancement before shipping to RTC.
Authorization for advancement is cancelled upon graduation from
recruit training.

Per reference (a),

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board  

3.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.

for



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03626-03

    Original file (03626-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 32/06073 dated 20 October 2003, a copy of which is In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06363-03

    Original file (06363-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02648-03

    Original file (02648-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01488-03

    Original file (01488-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05690-02

    Original file (05690-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01747-00

    Original file (01747-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08369-00

    Original file (08369-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06880-02

    Original file (06880-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06621-07

    Original file (06621-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 6 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02

    Original file (06127-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...