DEPARTMENT’tQF
TH;; NAV Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
I
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 204-01
11 July 2001
Your allegations of error and
statemen,t of 6 July 2001.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
The Board also considered
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May
2001, a copy of which is attached.
your rebuttal
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Additionally, during your initial period of service you had to
serve for four continuous years to be eligible for the Good
Conduct Medal and you served for approximately three years and
four months.
in any marking category, and you received several such
marks.Accordingly, your application has been denied.
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
In this connection, the Board substantially
Further, an individual could have no mark below 3.0
The names
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF TH ’E NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
04 NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON,
DC. 20350-2000
IN REPLY REFER
09B13/1U517092
Ser
29 May 2001
TO
From:
To:
Subj:
,
Ref:
Encl:
Chief of Naval Operations
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
(N09B13)
IN THE CASE OF
(a) BCNR
(b) 10 U.S.C. 1552
ltr AEG:jdh Docket No: 204-01 of 20 Feb 01
(1) BCNR File
(2) Service Record
As requested by reference (a) and in accordance with
1.
reference (b), the Chief of Naval Operations has reviewed
subject man's case.
2.
The USS NASHVILLE did not
medals during the time period
qualify for any Vietnam service
as
onboard.
3.
Enclosures (1) and (2) are returned as requested.
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04699-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. 04699-01 of 26 ( 1 ) BCNR File (2) Service Record CASE OF July 2001 As requested by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04774-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 200 1. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01407-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05094-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Dee 2001 OlU1385 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS \ Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF FIREMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05090-01 with microfiche service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05083-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. 20350~2000 N OF THE NAV Y S REPLY REFER TO IN 5420 N130Dl/OlU1252 12 Sep 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE FIREMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05083-01 with microfiche service record The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00530-01
In this connection, the Board substantially The Board will reconsider your request for the Air Medal if the 1650/3 and plane commander completes the attached OPNAV Form submits it to the Board of Decorations and Medals. Regulations that govern submission of an official recommendation require that the recommendation be signed by an "officer senior to the person being recommended. 20350-2000 NAV Y N S IN REPLY REFER TO 09B13/1U518366 Ser 29 August 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chief of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07573-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13;ql~‘~~;;~~~ MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07573-00 with microfiche service record 1. Officer‘- requests that his contract be rewritten and favorable action that would 1160.6A,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01501-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The member requests the removal of his fitness report for the period 1 January 1985 to 28 February 1986 and to file the member senior’s endorsement to his fitness report for the period 1 October 1998 to 31 May 1999. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01105-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 1105-01 20 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05164-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 25 September 2000 for four Reference (b) provides a zone OS(O304) rate/NEC at the time th e years to continue active service. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1)...