DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
ELP
Docket No. 303-02
9 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
Your allegations of error and injustice were
8 May 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
considered your application on
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 July 1996 for
The evaluation report for the period 15 June to 23 July 2000
shows that you were assigned an adverse mark of 1.0 in military
bearing and character.
The reporting senior noted that you
However, the evaluation
for the period 16 June 1999 to 15 June 2000 shows that you were
assigned a marginal mark of 2.0 in the rating category of
military bearing and character.
you had received counseling on three occasions for exercising
poor judgment and indebtedness,
misuse of a government credit card.
The reporting senior noted that
and were formally reprimanded for
four years at age 20.
class (E-4) on 16 June 1999.
Performance evaluations you provide show that for the evaluation
period ending 15 June 1999,
or above standards in all categories.
continued to use poor judgment by failing to pay your government
You had
credit card bill after liquidation of a travel claim.
become an administrative burden by failing to uphold Navy core
values.
On 23 July 2000 you were honorably released from active duty,
transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
You were not recommended for advancement or retention.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment by the
commanding officer.
The Board is reluctant to substitute its
judgment for that of the commanding officer who is on the scene
and is best qualified to determine who should be recommended for
retention.
13-month period documenting three counselings and problems with
your government credit card debt provided sufficient
justify-
cation for a non-recommendation for retention and assignment of
an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board thus concluded that the
reenlistment code was proper and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied,
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board believed two performance evaluations over a
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that a
You are entitled to have
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01
A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07822-00
you exercised poor judgment and immaturity in the handling of your financial affairs, been involved in two incidents of The reporting senior noted that during this period Your performance as an EW2 However, the domestic violence, and failed your semi-annual physical readiness test. discharged on 24 March 2000 with an You were not recommended for retention and were honorably RX-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04708-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 12 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. failure to pay a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03796-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review In this military bearing/character, and Your record further reflects that you received an adverse special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16 June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01549-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. an altercation with your spouse, off base, which resulted in a military protective order against you; on 14 May 1998, you were ‘counseled for falsely representing yourself in civil court; on 22 June 1998, you were counseled for being disrespectful in language to a senior noncommissioned officer during a live fire exercise; and on 27 August 1998, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03909-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your reenlistment code was assigned based on your performance during your last year on active duty, and that you were counseled concerning the fact that you were not eligible to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00494-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 1998 at age 18. In the evaluation for the period ending 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01912-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Cor ection of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, co sidered your application on 11 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materqal submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807519
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7519-98 14 July 1999 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07334-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that a record, which included a disciplinary action and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment...