DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 294-00
20 March 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 PERS 822 of 21 March
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
2oo0, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
WAVY l LRSOIIIL COMMAND
INTtDRlTY DRIVE
YlLLlNDTOl
38055-0000
S710
TW
7220
PERS-822
21 Mar 00
MEMORANDUM FOR
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOZCB
ION ICO
Ref:
Encl:
(a) BUPERS memo 5420 Pers-OOZCB of 6 Mar 00
(b) Title 10 USC 1411
(1) Copy of Statement of Service dated 20 Mar 00
(2) BCNR file
Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in
Specifically,
Petitioner requests a
(PEBD) adjustment from 21 September 1980
1 .
subject officer's case.
pay entry base date
to 1 September 1980.
Per reference (b) a person shall be considered to first
2.
become a member of a uniformed service on the date the person
is first enlisted, inducted,
service.
the U.S. Navy was on 22 September 1980.
or appointed in a uniformed
signed a contract to enter
The first time
Based on reference (b),
3.
22 September 1980 as stated in enclosure (1).
we recommend member's PEBD remain
4.
Enclosure (2) is returned.
Officer Retirements
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07491-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. to document Petitioner's pay entry base date of 9 May Members in NCP do not perform any drills and initial period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01307-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08239-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served 3 years, 11 months and 29 days of active enlisted service and therefore is not entitled to E pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05858-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00028-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject officer's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08029-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. 2. certain criteria are entitled to constructive credit. 6 months and 9 days of active duty and was not entitled to Enclosure (1) shows member only completed 19 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 13_22_10 CDT 2000
PERS-85 has advised that his projected promotion date, if his petition is approved, is 1 December 1999. d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), PERS-822, the NPC office with cognizance over officer retirements, also recommended approval of Petitioner’s request to remove his name from the retired list, return him to the active duty list, and allow his promotion to captain to proceed as scheduled. That PERS-85 be notified of this action, so that Petitioner’s promotion pursuant to his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08073-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. request comments and recommendations in Specifically, petitioner requests increase Per reference (b), only those personnel who are transferred 2. to the Fleet Reserve are accorded the increase of retainer pay for Extraordinary Heroism. Assistant Officer Retirements Branch Head, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04714-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute s, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant t demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01832-02
Specifically, Petitioner requests to be retired (b) requires TO years active commissioned service Reference 2. to retire as an officer. request was erroneously processed through PERS-822; while correcting that error, Navy as an officer while a member of the Fleet Reserve and only served 5 years, service. If I indeed do not have the 10 years required to retired as an officer, I certainly have the more than thirty years total active and inactive service to allow me retirement at the highest...