Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08175-00
Original file (08175-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 8175-00
21 June 2001

Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine
Corps, dated 1 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and

In this connection, the Board substantially

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

copy to:

The American Legion

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORP

S

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-5103

it, REPLY REFER TO:
1650
MMMA-3
1MayOl

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL 

RECORDS  ( BCNR )

Subj:

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE  

FORMER MARINE

OF-

6.

1 . Review of
he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal.
that he served in Vietnam in support of Operation Frequent Wind
for the period April 22 to May 2, 1975, and the Armed Forces
Expeditionary Medal is authorized for this operation.

ervice records fail to reveal that
The records show

The Vietnam Service Medal is authorized for service in

2.
Vietnam during the period March 15, 1962, to January 28, 1973,
he would not qualify for
and since he served after this date,
the award.

3.

A point of contact at MMMA is Mr.

@ 784-9206.

by direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01

    Original file (06369-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory In this connection, the Board substantially You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06386-01

    Original file (06386-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00177-01

    Original file (00177-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS ROA D 3280 RUSSELL QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1650 MMMA-3 30ctOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) Subj: ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE OF FORMER MARINE During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple 1. a review of his service and medical records, Since there is no indication in the records of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01074-01

    Original file (01074-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2001, a copy of which is attached. they were not present and cannot attest Statements from which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09

    Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01

    Original file (03975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05566-01

    Original file (05566-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 July 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-01

    Original file (06639-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of these replies are forwarded as Enclosure (3) is a copy of a letter forwarded 1993 regarding his entitlement to (1) and (2) _ During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple Heart 2. was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States was engaged. and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10969-07

    Original file (10969-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 24 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...