Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07331-01
Original file (07331-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:dd_j
Docket No: 7331-01
27 November 2001

This is in reference to  
provisions of title  

your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

10 of the  

(fnitetl 

Stales 

(‘ode, section  

1552.

I3oartl for 
icalion 

(:ort-ection of Naval Records, sitting in executive
on 27 November 2001. Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the  
appl 
session, considered your  
iIi_justice  were reviewed in accordance wi  
to the proceedings of this Hoard. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your 
applicable statutes, 
opinion furnished by  
which is attached.

regulatioris and policies.
CMC memorandum  

nlalcrial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and

4050. 
M LFT 3 WC of 19 October 2001, a copy of
I 

tll administrative regulations and procedures applicable

the Board considered the advisory

application, together 

III addition, 

with 

all 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has   been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the  panel will be furnished upon request.

ot‘ 

It is regretted that the circumstances  
You are entitled to have the  
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a  
when 
demonstrate the existence of  

noarvl reconsider its decision  

material error or injustice.

‘7 for a correction  

pr~~lmhle 

applyin,

of‘ an 

your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
upon submission of new and material
III this regard, it is important

presumprion of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,

oi‘t‘icial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775

IN REPLY REFER TO

4050.1M
LFT-3-WC
19 

Ott 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

WARRANT OFFICER  

1

Ref:

(a) Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR)

Warrant Officer 1

1.
North Carolina to Bahrain in 1999.
were modified, by his Admin Unit,
storage of privately owned vehicles.

transferred from Cherry Point,

The Marine's orders

authorizing shipment and

The JFTR, paragraph  

U5800 states that storage of a

2.
privately owned vehicle (POV) is in lieu of shipping a POV.
A Marine with valid permanent change of station orders
(PCS), assigning him to an overseas duty station, is
authorized to store a POV if the overseas country doesn't
allow the importation of  
and storage of multiple  

The JFTR prohibits shipment

POVs.
POVs.

Had the Marine provided his PCS order and all

3.
modifications to the Traffic Management Office (TMO) at
Cherry Point he would have been advised that he wasn't
authorized to ship and store a POV.
authorizing an individual to store a POV, provides the
Marine with a letter authorizing the Marine to be
reimbursed for POV storage.

The TMO, when

This Headquarters cannot approve reimbursement to

4.
Warrant Officer 1 Messer,
in direct violation of the JFTR, which is law.
Marine's Admin Unit at Cherry Point erred in modifying the
POVs.
Marine's orders to include shipment and storage of  
We are unable to recommend a favorable determination of
this case.

as shipping and storing a POV is

The

vy

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801303

    Original file (9801303.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01303 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to corrected to show that on 10 September 1997,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01077

    Original file (BC-2004-01077.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant’s POV did not meet the standards for operations in New Zealand without major modifications, he was entitled to ship the vehicle from his assignment at the time to the CONUS for storage. His private owned vehicle (POV) was erroneously shipped from Japan to New Zealand under the authority of Special Order AA- 1299, dated 7 Aug 03, and is authorized to be reshipped from New Zealand to the appropriate vehicle processing center for storage under the provisions of the Joint...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021831

    Original file (20110021831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that based on a review of the documents submitted by the applicant and of the parameters on POV shipment and storage in the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), G-4 recommends the applicant’s request be disapproved. It further indicates the JFTR provides for shipment/storage of one POV when POV transportation is not authorized to the new overseas permanent duty station. Therefore, there are no provisions of law or regulation that allow for reimbursement for storage of a second...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03390

    Original file (BC-2002-03390.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the traffic management office (TMO) at Spangdahlem Air Base (AB), Germany, that he could ship his vehicle at personal expense and be reimbursed up to what it would cost the government to ship the vehicle. In addition to shipping his POV at personal expense without authorization from the TMO, the applicant did not use a United States (U.S.) flag vessel to ship the POV. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015994

    Original file (20130015994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he had not received counseling by that Army official he would not have shipped his POV at his own expense. A review of the available evidence fails to reveal any evidence showing that the applicant was misinformed by Army officials regarding shipment of his POV. The applicant is not authorized reimbursement for shipment of his POV within the CONUS.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00761

    Original file (BC-2003-00761.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Flag carrier service is not available must be provided to the member and must be attached to the request for reimbursement. As to the applicant’s request for reimbursement for the mileage of this vehicle, we concur with the JPPSO-SAT/ECAF assessment and are of the opinion that the applicant should be reimbursed for the mileage to get the vehicle to the POV port or vehicle processing center serving the old permanent duty station, since it appears that he would have been entitled to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03475

    Original file (BC 2013 03475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA/ECAF recommends approval. Incident to the PCS, the applicant effected a shipment of HHG at government expense, and personally arranged to ship his motorcycle to the Philippines. However, the motorcycle qualifies as HHG and he was authorized to ship it to the Philippines as HHG.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00430

    Original file (BC-2003-00430.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For members departing Goodfellow AFB who wish to take a vehicle on the AMHS ferry, the member calls the AMHS office direct to obtain a reservation. The TMO at Goodfellow AFB states the applicant discussed travel by POV via the AMHS ferry with them but decided against it and requested an airline ticket. Had he indicated he wished to ship his POV via the AMHS ferry, he would have had to have a reservation prior to departing his origin base, accompany his POV, and he would not have been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03398

    Original file (BC-2004-03398.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03398 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The transportation charges in the amount of $3,802.36 to ship his automobile from Australia to Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB), Alabama, be waived. ECAF states that the applicant exhausted his POV...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100816

    Original file (0100816.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00816 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed the travel expenses incurred to pick up his privately owned vehicle (POV), which was stored in Jackson, Mississippi, during his permanent change of station (PCS) assignment from Yokota, AB, Japan, to Mountain Home AFB,...