Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05836-00
Original file (05836-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAJAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No: 5836-00
7 June 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 5 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

considered your

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The record shows that you satisfactorily completed

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 December 1988
at age 18.
initial training and an interim duty assignment.
1989 you reported to the USS FLINT (AI: 32).
were referred for a psychiatric evaluation after you
hyperventilated.
personality disorder based on your history and psychiatric
testing.
personality disorder and warned that  
improve you would be processed for an administrative discharge.

Subsequently, you
On 13 November 1989 you were diagnosed with a

In January 1990 you were counseled concerning the

On 12 October

j.f your performance did not

In the performance evaluation for the period ending 6 February
2000 you were assigned adverse marks of 2.8 in the categories of
military bearing and personal behavior.
Although the discharge
processing package is not filed in the record, the adverse
performance evaluation apparently resulted in the decision to
process you for an administrative discharge.
Board assumed that you were properly notified of separation
processing due to the diagnosed personality disorder and were
given an opportunity to exercise your procedural rights.
records shows that you were honorably discharged on 6 February

In addition, the

The

1990.
were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and

You desire a change in the reenlistment code so that you can
reenter the Navy.
by your concern for your mother who was seriously ill, pay
problems caused by an error in your pay account, and financial
problems caused by the move to the West Coast to join your ship.

You state that your difficulties were caused

As indicated, you were diagnosed with a personality

Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged based on a diagnosed personality
disorder.
disorder and were given an opportunity to improve your
performance and remain in the Navy.
performance evaluation shows that  
The Board thus concluded that the last
continued to be poor.
performance evaluation was sufficient to support the assignment
of the RE-4 reenlistment code.

you:? performance and conduct

However, the last

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel  

wil:L be furnished upon request.

The names and

of your case are such that

It is regretted that the circumstances
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission-of new and material
previous.Ly considered by the Board.
evidence or other matter not  
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a  
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

cor.rection  of an official naval

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07597-00

    Original file (07597-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, on 3 October 1990 you received an At that time you were assigned a reenlistment A psychiatric conducted on 22 June 1990, found that you had a post traumatic stress disorder, and The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07974-97

    Original file (07974-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 1993. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After an evaluation, the diagnosis was personality." The Board also noted the comments by the CO in which he stated that you attempted suicide in 1987 and again in 1990, and on 16 April 1992 you stated that you were going to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07743-98

    Original file (07743-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the performance evaluation for You were Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder. evaluations and the psychologist's opinion that you could be at risk to harm yourself or others were sufficient to support the decision not to recommend you for reenlistment and to assign you an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01391-06

    Original file (01391-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05654-09

    Original file (05654-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2010. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07334-00

    Original file (07334-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that a record, which included a disciplinary action and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01

    Original file (00151-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11034-10

    Original file (11034-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ' Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken, if any, for this misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03743-08

    Original file (03743-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the period from 26 June. The Board also considered the medical documentation submitted in support of your case. It also appears that your fraud continued when you enlisted in the Army National Guard by obtaining a waiver of your physical disability while serving in the Marine Corps and, by omission of your service in the Navy, which included the diagnosis of a severe personality disorder and nonrecommendation for reenlistment, both resulting in the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04732-10

    Original file (04732-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...