DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
31 March 1999
7743-98
-Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 March 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy for four years on
15 December 1987.
At that time you had completed over four years
of active service on a prior enlistment.
The record shows that you reported to your first duty station in
this enlistment on 24 May 1988.
In the performance evaluation
for the period 25 May 1988 to 31 March 1989 you were assigned an
overall mark of 3.6, but not recommended for advancement or
retention in the Navy..
as follows:
The evaluation comments state, in part,
. potential for a position of leadership is rated as
. .
fair to poor.
qualification program reflects upon his ability to
competently supervise junior personnel with their
qualifications.
His lack of interest towards the ship's
~.
On 24 April 1989 you were transferred.
1 May 1989, a recommendation that you be discharged due to a
diagnosed personality disorder was denied because you had not
been found to be a danger to yourself or others, and you had not
been counseled and given an opportunity to overcome your
The record shows that on
On 13 July 1989 you reported to the USS PETREL
Fifteen days later you were counseled concerning your
deficiencies.
(ASR 14).
lack of initiative, reliability and leadership.
1989 you were diagnosed with a mixed personality disorder.
evaluation states that if sufficiently stressed, you were likely
to become ineffective, possibility causing harm to yourself or
others.
On 13 September
The
Apparently based on the new psychiatric evaluation you were again
Although the documentation to support
processed for discharge.
discharge processing is not in the record, it appears that you
did not object to separation.
the period 1 July to 25 October 1989 you were assigned marginal
marks of 3.0 or 3.2 in every evaluation category.
honorably discharged on 25 October 1989 based on the diagnosed
At that time you acknowledged that you
personality disorder.
were not recommended for reenlistment.
In the performance evaluation for
You were
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality
disorder.
evaluations and the psychologist's opinion that you could be at
risk to harm yourself or others were sufficient to support the
decision not to recommend you for reenlistment and to assign you
an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board concluded that your poor performance
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01880-01
opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisory to the Surgeon General for Psychiatry, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and a copy of which is attached. * The Board found that on 10 November 1994 you enlisted in the Navy 'The record reflects that on 27 February 1995, while at age 18. under...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07858-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your general discharge and reenlistment code should not be changed due to your diagnosed personality disorder and insufficiently high conduct mark average. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02429-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00980-01
980-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicat:.on for correction of your A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Iof an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08479-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnoses of a personality disorder and possible risk to harm yourself or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04420-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 February 1999 at age 20. on 18 January 2000 you were counseled regarding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05642-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At that time Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when there is a determination...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06101-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a potential risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...