DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
ELP
Docket No. 5769-01
7 December 2001
Dear
B
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
considered your application on
Your allegations of error and injustice were
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
4 Decmeber 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on
23 April 1992 for eight years at age 19.
You were ordered to
active duty for a period of two years on 17 March 1993.
The
record reflects that you were advanced to SN (E-3) and served
without any disciplinary infractions.
honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Naval
Reserve, and assigned an RE-7 reenlistment code.
Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-7 reenlistment code
to individuals completing an initial two-year period of active
duty obligation in the Naval Reserve.
established since most of these reservists are unable to meet the
meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment in only
two years of service, specifically,
or have passed an examination for pay grade E-4.
be serving in pay grade E-4
One of these
On 16 March 1995 you were
This reenlistment code was
criteria must be met in order to be eligible for an RE-1 reen-
listment code.
An RE-7 reenlistment code is not a derogatory
code and it may allow reenlistment.
authority rests with recruiting officials and not this Board.
The Board concluded the assigned reenlistment code was proper and
Accordingly, your application has been
no change is warranted.
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
However, reenlistment
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05212-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 15 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05958-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 18 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 February 1996 you were You were Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment or who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01
A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03300-01
recommended for advancement, an RE-4 reenlistment code was the only code that could be assigned. differently than others released from active duty under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06321-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05073-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,. You were honorably discharged on 23 April Regulations provide that upon separation from active duty, individuals serving in pay grade E-3 professional growth criteria for reenlistment, but who are ,dho have failed to meet eligible in all other respects and recommended for advancement, This means the shall be assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01840-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 2001. accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, considered your application on regulations and policies. only one...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04232-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 4 September 2001 and served for more than three years without disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00934-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An individual separated in paygrade E-3 who fails to meet the above criteria may receive an RE-3R reenlistment code if he/she is recommended for...