DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NA’IAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
ELP
Docket No.
7 June 2001
5073-00
Dear
This is inreference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy
Records, sitting in executive session,. considered your
application on 6 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations
,of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in
The record
four years at age 20.
without incident until 25 June 1990 when you received a
nonjudicial punishment (NJP).
surrounding the NJP are unknown since the entry in the record
documenting the NJP record is
The facts and circumstances
ref:Lects that you served
illegib:Le.
zhe Navy on 11 July 1989 for
.
You were subsequently advanced to SN (E-3), served without
further incident, and were recommended for reenlistment. On
relea;sed from active duty,
9 June 1993, you,were honorably
transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-3R
reenlistment code.
1997 upon fulfillment of your military obligation.
You were honorably discharged on 23 April
Regulations provide that upon separation from active duty,
individuals serving in pay grade E-3
professional growth criteria for reenlistment, but who are
,dho have failed to meet
eligible in all other respects and recommended for advancement,
This means the
shall be assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code.
individual is eligible for a probationary reenlistment and may
be reenlisted by a Navy recruiting
ac,tivity for a period of two
years with the approval of the Commander, Navy Personnel Command.
The Board could find no error or
inju,stice in your assigned
reenlistment code since you received the most favorable code
authorized by regulations and were treated no differently than
others separated under similar circumstances.
concluded that the reenlistment code
warranted.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
The Board
'das proper and no change is
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,.
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 07915-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 July 1998 and then served without incident for almost six years. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06113-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02513-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Accordingly, your request has been Further, your record does not show that you paygrade E-4, and you have presented Accordingly, the reenlistment That reenlistment code may be denied. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02529-02
A three-member panel -of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. you were not advanced to HN until 16 April 1989, which did not allow you much time to be advanced to HM3 prior to your release An RE-3R reenlistment code is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04232-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 4 September 2001 and served for more than three years without disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12763-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04524-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2009. In your application you are requesting that an RE-3B reenlistment code be changed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11228-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03731-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...