Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05733-01
Original file (05733-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

20370-5100

MEH:ddj
Docket No:  
27 November 2001

5733-01

This is in reference to  
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the

your- application for correction of your deceased former spouse
1552.

‘Ilnited States Code, section  

 

’s naval

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 November 200 1. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with  
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your former spouse
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
the advisory   opinion furnished by
copy of which is attached.

’s
In addition, the Board considered

adnlinistrative regulations and procedures applicable

174 1 MMSR 6 of 1 November 2001, a

nlemorandum  

CMC 

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the 

upon request

members of the panel will be furnished

.

 

  your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
It is regretted that the circumstances of
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

(7 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to

In this regard, it is important

applyin,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORP
D

3280 RUSSELL ROA

QUANTICO.  VIRGINIA

  22 134-S IO

S

3

‘N REPLY REFER TO:
1741
MMSR- 6
1 Nov 01

MEMORVVDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

E OF THE LATE

Ref:

1.

(a) MMER Route Sheet of  
(b) MMSR-5C 
ltr 1800 of 

40ct01, Docket No. 5733-01
15FebO1,

included with petition

The reference requests an advisory opinion on Mrs.
petition to correct her late former husband,

Barnes' record to show that he enrolled in the Reserve Component
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSRP) prior to his death on 17 February
2000.

Records at this Headquarters show that Major  

2.
given the opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage and, unfortunately,
did not do so.
his death. We, therefore,

He was not enrolled in the Plan at the time of

must regretfully recommend that Mrs.

v was

etition not be granted favorable consideration.

Head, Separation and
Retirement Branch
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00

    Original file (08329-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00118-01

    Original file (00118-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 118-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05749-01

    Original file (05749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Roartl. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this willt your application, together naval record and applicable the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03968-01

    Original file (03968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08111-00

    Original file (08111-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ record to , Upon reaching retirement eligibility Master Sergeant 2. was given the opportunity to elect RCSBP coverage in March of 1982.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03

    Original file (00769-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07274-01

    Original file (07274-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. has contacted the Defense Finance and Ohio requesting enrollment in Cleveland, that to enroll at this time would require He was tc that he pay back...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07993-02

    Original file (07993-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. His RCSBP child began receiving retired pay on 18 April 1984. coverage became SBP child coverage on that date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08031-01

    Original file (08031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. tired from the Marine Corps and never attained the Warrant Officer W-4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00213-03

    Original file (00213-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0213-03 The reference requests an a petition to correct show that he was enrolled in the Reserve Component survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) when he died on 3 June 2000. record to 2.