Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03731-01
Original file (03731-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 3731-01
27 December 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 December 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
a copy of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

 

N32/06527 of 6 December 2001,

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE  

38054-5057

IN REPLY   REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
6 

Dee 01

N32/06527

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR REQUEST ICO

(a) OPNAVINST 
1160.6A
(b)  COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 03731-01

enlist in 

paygrade  E-3 or below if

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
prior service members must
establishing eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed
Class 
have skills convertible to an enclosure (2) rating will be
enlisted at their discharge  
of E-3.
(I),

applicant was authorized to enlist as an  

paygrade  up to the maximum  

According to the DD Form  

As per reference

"A"  school.

E-4/ABF3.

1966/3  contained in enclosure

Per reference (a),

(b), Army 

OSVETs  who do not

paygrade

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01

    Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01

    Original file (07437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-01

    Original file (06813-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06637-01

    Original file (06637-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06037-01

    Original file (06037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    13oartl for panel of the (lorrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this tted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, atldi tion, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01

    Original file (05170-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01

    Original file (05478-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06207-01

    Original file (06207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6207-01 27 November 2001 This is in provisions of title reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the IO of the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. wert‘ reviewed in accordance wit panel of the three-mrmher A session, considered your iii_justice to the proceedings your application, applicable opinion furnished by copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07090-01

    Original file (07090-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory your naval record and N32/06515 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05694-01

    Original file (05694-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LP:dd_j J Dc?cket No: IS November 200 1 5694-01 This is in reference to provisions of‘ title IO your of the apl)lication llnitrtl St;ltcas Code, section 1552. fOr correction ot’ your naval rt’cord pursuant to the three-rnembcr panel ot‘ your application in ;iccorhncc with A consitlerctl reviewed proceedings of this application, applicable statutes, opinion furnished by a copy of which...