DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5079-00
22 June 2001
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28
The record reflects that you received
December 1977 at age 21.
The offenses included unauthorized
two nonjudicial punishments.
absences totalling 13 days and willful disobedience of a lawful
order.
On 10 September 1980 you became an unauthorized absentee. In
January 1984, while still an unauthorized absentee, you were
recommended for an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct due being absent without leave.
recommendation, you elected not to return to military control and
waived your right to present your case to an administrative
the
discharge
recommendation for separation was approved and you were
discharged with an other than honorable discharge on 1 February
1984.
In its review of your application the Board carefully
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
board.*' After review by the discharge authority,
When informed of the
weighed.all
Therefore, the Board
However, the Board
immaturity, and good postservice conduct.
concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge, given your discharge in
absentia for a lengthy period of absence.
concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
The names and
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04912-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. It was recommended that you be processed On 8 May 1978 you received a On 2 June 1978 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of unsuitability due to your diagnosed personality disorder. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06414-00
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 22 November 1983 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for an unauthorized absence of about two days and four instances of On 21 December failing to go to your appointed place of duty. Based on the foregoing record, administrative discharge, the Board assumed that you were filed in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06735-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not In this regard, the Board believed sufficient to warrant relief. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02159-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 1979 at age 19. On 20 April 1981, you escaped~ from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01183-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. officer properly concluded that you were not a suitable candidate for rehabilitation, given your four nonjudicial punishments. Therefore, the Board to an administrative discharge board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06519-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to avoid trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 5024-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. While the request is not in your record, it is presumed that you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing offenses. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02171-01
Board also noted that the initial sentence to a bad conduct discharge was suspended, better discharge. which resulted in the discharge being executed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07438-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction by a special court-martial of an unauthorized absence of about 167 days, a period of more than five...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05505-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, it is clear that you would have been issued an undesirable discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment if you had not been convicted by court-martial of the unauthorized absences. Consequently, when...