Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06519-00
Original file (06519-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2   N A V Y   ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N   DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

TRG 
Docket No:  6519-00 
28 February 2001 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
n a ~ l  recozd pursuant to the provisions of title: 10 of the United 
States Code section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 27 February 2001.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 20 
December 1979 at age 19.  The record shows that you served 
without incident until  1 April 1981.  On that date you received 
nonjudicial punishment for disobedience.  In March 1982 you were 
an unauthorized absentee for about three days, for which there is 
no disciplinary action in the record. 

Your military record shows that you submitted a written request 
for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to 
avoid trial by court-martial for an unauthorized absence from 6 
July 1982 to 21 October 1984, a period of about 624 days.  Your 
record also shows that prior to submitting this request you 
conferred with a qualified military lawyer at which time you were 
advised of your rights and warned of the probable adverse 
consequences of accepting such a discharge.  The Board found that 
your request was granted and, as a result of this action, you 
were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the 
potential penalties of a punitive discharge and confinement at 
hard labor.  You were discharged on 18 April 1984. 

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all 

potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and 
contentions that you have overcome your abuse of alcohol and 
that, in effect, you have been a good citizen for many years. 
The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant 
recharacterization of your discharge given your record of 
misconduct and especially your request for discharge to avoid 
trial for the lengthy period of unauthorized absence.  The Board 
believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your 
request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was 
approved since, by this action, you escaped the possibility of 
confinement at hard labor and a punitive discharge.  Further, the 
Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain 
when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be 
permitted to change it now.  The Board concluded that your 
discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. 

Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PE'EIFE'ER 
Executive Director 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06291-02

    Original file (06291-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to avoid trial by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08916-02

    Original file (08916-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for unauthorized absences totalling more than five months, and your total period of absence of about nine months. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01425-02

    Original file (01425-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-01

    Original file (08183-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for unauthorized absences totalling about 13 months, and your prior unauthorized absences of nearly a month. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01421-02

    Original file (01421-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for serious offenses, and the prior unauthorized absences of more than a month. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10975-02

    Original file (10975-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2 0 0 3 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and on 26 June 1984 you received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of trial by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06606-01

    Original file (06606-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07666-00

    Original file (07666-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. unauthorized absence of about seven days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05434-01

    Original file (05434-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your military record shows that on 10 February 1970 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for an unauthorized absence of nine days, two instances of willful disobedience of a lawful order, two instances of disrespect, theft of a jeep, assault, and possession of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10961-02

    Original file (10961-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, which resulted in five NJPs and your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying...