Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06414-00
Original file (06414-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

NA\‘AL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

TRG
Docket No: 6414-00
6 June 2001

Dear

applicat:Lon for correction of your
This is in reference to your  
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 May  
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

2001.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 27
January 1982 at age 17 and reported for three years of active
duty on 10 November 1982..
were an unauthorized absentee on two occasions totaling nine
days, for which there is no disciplinary action in the record.
On 22 November 1983 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
an unauthorized absence of about two days and four instances of
On 21 December
failing to go to your appointed place of duty.
1983, you received another NJP for an unauthorized absence of
about eight days.

The record shows that during 1983 you

On 20 January 1984 you began a period of unauthorized absence
a period of about 22 days.
which lasted until 22 February 1984,
However, there is no disciplinary action in the record for this
On 9 March 1984 you received NJP for two instances of
offense.
disobedience and failing to go to your appointed place of duty.

Based on the foregoing record,
administrative discharge,
the Board assumed that you were
filed in your service record,
properly notified of the discharge action and of your right to

Although the discharge package is not

you were processed for an

have your case heard by an administrative discharge board.
were discharged under other than honorable conditions on 27 July
1984.

You

such 

genlaral discharge.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01013-01

    Original file (01013-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 October 1983 the discharge The Board concluded that the The Board noted your contentions that you received the Navy Unit In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, limited education, and the fact that it has been nearly 18 years since you were discharged. foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of nine NJPs. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01892-09

    Original file (01892-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 25 August 1984, the separation authority directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02537-01

    Original file (02537-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    that failure to take corrective action could result in administrative separation under other than honorable conditions. Board noted the aggravating factor that you waived the right to present your case to an ADB, should be retained or discharged under honorable conditions. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03322-02

    Original file (03322-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 August 1983, your record Although your record further reflects that you were an unauthorized absentee from 18 to 20 October 1983, a period of two days, it does not indicate if disciplinary action was taken. However,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02392-07

    Original file (02392-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 29 November 1979, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. On 11 February 1982, you failed to comply...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02392-07

    Original file (02392-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 29 November 1979, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. On 11 February 1982, you failed to comply...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06266-07

    Original file (06266-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board tound the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05948-07

    Original file (05948-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 3 July 1984.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04313-09

    Original file (04313-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. records.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08485-10

    Original file (08485-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...