Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04524-08
Original file (04524-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX TRG

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 4524-08
25 March 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 March 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 29 November 1994 and agreed
to serve on active duty for three years. You reported for active
duty on 18 January 1995 and served until you were released from
active duty on 30 January 1998 with an honorable characterization
of service. At that time you were serving as a seaman (SN;
paygrade E-3). There are no performance evaluations filed in
your record and the quality of your service is unknown.

In your application you are requesting that an RE-3B reenlistment
code be changed. An RE-3B is assigned when an individual is
separated for Parenthood, Pregnancy or Childbirth. However, a
review of the DD Form 214 filed in your digital record clearly
shows that you were assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-3R to those
individuals who do not meet professional growth criteria by
advancing to petty officer during an extended period of active
duty. As indicated you were serving as an SN at the time of your
release from active duty. An RE-3R code means that you are
recommended for a probationary reenlistment during which
advancement in rate is required. A copy of the pages from the
regulations which sets forth the information concerning
reenlistment codes is enclosed.
Since you have been treated no differently than others in your
situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of the RE-3R reenlistment code. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members

of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval

record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Se he

Executive tor
Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05073-00

    Original file (05073-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,. You were honorably discharged on 23 April Regulations provide that upon separation from active duty, individuals serving in pay grade E-3 professional growth criteria for reenlistment, but who are ,dho have failed to meet eligible in all other respects and recommended for advancement, This means the shall be assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 07915-04

    Original file (07915-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 July 1998 and then served without incident for almost six years. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02529-02

    Original file (02529-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel -of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. you were not advanced to HN until 16 April 1989, which did not allow you much time to be advanced to HM3 prior to your release An RE-3R reenlistment code is not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02513-03

    Original file (02513-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Accordingly, your request has been Further, your record does not show that you paygrade E-4, and you have presented Accordingly, the reenlistment That reenlistment code may be denied. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12763-09

    Original file (12763-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04232-06

    Original file (04232-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 4 September 2001 and served for more than three years without disciplinary...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01181-10

    Original file (01181-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 June 1993, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11228-09

    Original file (11228-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00934-08

    Original file (00934-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An individual separated in paygrade E-3 who fails to meet the above criteria may receive an RE-3R reenlistment code if he/she is recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06569-10

    Original file (06569-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 April 2004, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3, and assigned a reentry code of RE-3R.