Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05037-00
Original file (05037-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JRE
Docket No: 
20 July 2001

503740

This is in reference to your  application. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted  of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you absented yourself without authority on 18 August 1998, and
remained absent until 23 March 1999. It appears that disciplinary proceedings were initiated
against you upon your return to military control, but they were suspended or terminated after
you were hospitalized for psychiatric evaluation on 15 April 1999. You were evaluated by a
medical board on 9 July 1999, given a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type,
and referred to the Physical Evaluation Board 
preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of the aforementioned mental
disorder, which it rated at 10%. You accepted those findings on 20 September 1999, and
were discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay on 15 October 

(PEB). On 2 September 1999, the PEB made

1999.

The Board noted that there is no indication in the medical board report that you were unable
to appreciate the nature, quality or wrongfulness of your actions when you absented yourself
without authority. The Board was not persuaded that you lacked mental responsibility, or
that your mental disorder was sufficiently extenuating or mitigating to warrant the correction
your record in such a manner that you would be entitled to pay and allowances for the

extended period when you were absent and performed no duties. It noted that your
commander ’s decision not to take disciplinary action against you, or to initiate administrative
separation action, is not equivalent a determination that you the absence should be excused.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01908-01

    Original file (01908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1908-01 19 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contend that you became worried while in recruit training that you would not be able to pay your bills after you learned...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01

    Original file (02732-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03165-01

    Original file (03165-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Although you were diagnosed a suffering from several mental disorder at that time, the only condition considered disabling was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, which the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined existed prior to service (EPTS), and was not service aggravated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01316-01

    Original file (01316-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable and policies. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09116-03

    Original file (09116-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.ou enlisted in the Navy ~n 20 September 1999 at age 20. The Board noted that applicable regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01880-01

    Original file (01880-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisory to the Surgeon General for Psychiatry, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and a copy of which is attached. * The Board found that on 10 November 1994 you enlisted in the Navy 'The record reflects that on 27 February 1995, while at age 18. under...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02627-03

    Original file (02627-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to a mental disorder. Consequently, when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02616-07

    Original file (02616-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07743-98

    Original file (07743-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the performance evaluation for You were Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder. evaluations and the psychologist's opinion that you could be at risk to harm yourself or others were sufficient to support the decision not to recommend you for reenlistment and to assign you an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00400-01

    Original file (00400-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated based on a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a...