Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02627-03
Original file (02627-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 2627-03
25 June 2003

Your allegations of error and

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board 
2001.
diagnosed you with a personality disorder.
that you had attempted suicide and were presently being protected
against harming yourself.
On 30 March 2001 you received an entry
level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment (other). At
that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by
regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual
separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to  a mental
disorder.
suicide attempt, the Board concluded that there is no error or
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.

.found that you enlisted in the Navy on 22 February
conducted on 20 March 2001,
It was also noted

Given the existence of such a disorder, and your

A psychiatric evaluation,

Accordingly, your

The names and votes of the members

Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01

    Original file (03886-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00574-01

    Original file (00574-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01908-01

    Original file (01908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1908-01 19 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contend that you became worried while in recruit training that you would not be able to pay your bills after you learned...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02469-99

    Original file (02469-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. The record reflects that on 30 June 1998 you were referred to a mental health unit because of suicidal ideation, inability to tolerate authority, and a prior undisclosed history of psychiatric treatment. Separation by erroneous entry is authorized when an enlistment would not have occurred if a disqualifying factor had been known prior to enlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08204-08

    Original file (08204-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘Based on the mental health evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03523-08

    Original file (03523-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code for your situation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02172-00

    Original file (02172-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. At that time you were assigned a Further, On 22 The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07609-01

    Original file (07609-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the Board could not tell if you The Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment and such a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06502-02

    Original file (06502-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially...