DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 4212-01
24 July 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 5 July 2001, a copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
I do not concur w
ith membe
rs request to amend h
is Nava
l r ecord.
liserve to tra
in opt
ion
is des
ly not e lig ib le for an Se
ing there EAOS. If the members are
igned for members on act
lect ive Reen
ld prov
ide an SRB after graduat
list ment Bonus and are
in or go
into a tra
ing
ld be
ion th is wou
The ob
are current
approach
status that wou
author
ized.
ive duty who
in ing
id not
From: FCC(SW)
, USN
To:
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
ENDATIONS IN CASE OF
1.
2.
cont
SNM was sepa
have
sent to F
refresh h
inues serv ice so h
ire Contro
is rat
ing sk ills.
rated from the serv
ice for 4 years and 4 months. He d
is contract was not a reen
l “A ” schoo l at the request of h
is rat
list ment. He was
ing deta
iler to
No schoo
en listed
option.
ls we re guaranteed
in the Navy. Th
in h is contract and he d
is makes h
im
ine lig ib le for the Ob
id not reen
list, he
liserve-to-Tra
3 .
SNM s
extens
tates he reen
ion. Th
listed/en
listed for a 4 year en
is is fa lse. SNM on
ly en listed for 4 years w
list ment w ith a 2 year
ith no extens
in
ion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00878-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer-3 (CWO-3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 CWO-3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2001 CWO-3 Selection Board. &rt in Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04514-97
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 19 September and 3 November 1997 and 20 May 1998 with reference (b), copies of which are attached. We cannot determine if the promotion recommendation is in accordance PRT regulations in effect at the time since or if the member could have been recommendation for promotion as it appears the member may have been out of two fitness reports. DSN MSC, USNR, f contact is LCD Pers-601,...
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00548
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDNAME or SERV ICEMEMBER(LAST, flRSTl\11DOLE IN ITIA L)PERSONAL APPEARANCE\'F.S NoxGRADE AfSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ,\l)DRF.SSANO OR ORGANIZATIONOfCOUNSEL VOTEOFTHE BOARDMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC' OT11£R OF.NY A67.90 liXlllBITSSUBMITTED TO THEBOARO I ORDERAPPOINTINGTH[:BOARD2 A l'l'Ll(';\TIONFOi{1uv 1t:W 01·OISC'llARGI'.3 Ll:TllROFNO1IFll'AIION4 BRIEFOFl'tRSONNtLFILECOUNSEL'SRl. :LEASE10 IHt80ARI)ADDITIONALEXIllBITSSUBMl'ITEDATT...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00752
GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservice record.The attachedbtiefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies the upgradeof the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00071
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEWCUUNSt:L1-- ---.- ---1NAIEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN17*\ TIONAODRt:SSANOORORGANl7AT IONOFCOUNSELt-\_ES--+- No----1(b) ( 6) x A42.00GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...
AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00071
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEW CUUNSt:L NA IEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN 17*\ TION AODRt:SSANOORORGANl7ATION OFCOUNSEL 1-- ---.- ---1\ESx (b) (6) (b) (6) MEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00015
GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorableandtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00473
GENERAL: The applicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable service record.Theattached brief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneraldischargeforMisconduct -DrugAbuseThe...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432
GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4695 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7041 S COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 pa) ci q@) Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) ter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) wit esting, in eff that the applicable naval record be corrected o change Petition 5 , aks r's Reenlistment Contract. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32...