DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 7126-00
22 August 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 7 August 1992 and reported
for two years of active duty on 12 August 1992.
that you received nonjudicial punishment on 5 November 1993 and
22 January 1994 for two short periods of unauthorized absence.
The punishments imposed resulted in your reduction to BMSA (E-2)
and a suspended reduction to BMSR (E-l).
The record shows
There are no further disciplinary actions in the record.
However, the record shows that you were reduced to BMSR,
apparently because of continued misconduct.
from active duty on 15 March 1994 with your service characterized
as being under honorable conditions by reason of a reduction in
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment
force.
and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
You were released
The Board concluded that your disciplinary record was sufficient
to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. In
addition, regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code to individuals who are separated in pay grade
Accordingly,
E-l following an extended period of active duty.
your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05769-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 April 1994 you were notified of proposed administrative separation action by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure due to your refusal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00959-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. On 7 June 1994, while still serving as an SR, you were honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve with an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08493-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. On 20 October 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that a record which includes two nonjudicial punishments, several counseling entries, and an alcohol related incident after...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05958-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 18 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 February 1996 you were You were Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment or who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06321-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07822-00
you exercised poor judgment and immaturity in the handling of your financial affairs, been involved in two incidents of The reporting senior noted that during this period Your performance as an EW2 However, the domestic violence, and failed your semi-annual physical readiness test. discharged on 24 March 2000 with an You were not recommended for retention and were honorably RX-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06700-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 25 February 1993 you received your fourth NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00195-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. treated no differently than others similarly separated, the Board Since you have been The names and votes of the members of the panel Accordingly, your application has The Board concluded that the reenlistment code was proper could find no error or injustice in your assigned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01038-01
in-charge (OINC) recommended to the discharge authority that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation. of your scheduled active duty for training and had sufficient time to make arrangements for child care, but you did not make the unit aware of problems until after your missed a drill and the period of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...