Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04058-01
Original file (04058-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 4058-01
24 July 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 149 w/attachments
BUPERS memorandum
Subject’s naval record

1145 SER 8

14/

lUOO33 of 2 1 June 2001

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show a reenlistment vice an extension.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

In correspondence attached as enclosure  

(2), the office having cognizance over the

b.

subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
contents of enclosure  
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
following corrective action.

and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

Docket No: 4058-01

a. The 23 month extension executed on 12 June 1997 (operative date on or about 2

September 

1997), is null and void.

b. The 23 month extension executed on 31 July 1999 (operative date on or about 2

August 

1999), is null and void.

C. He was discharged on 1 September 1997 and reenlisted on 2 September 1997. The

term is 2 years.

d. He executed a 22 month extension, operative date on or about 2 September 1999.

e.

That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
4.
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

c&&a,-
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

  (a), has been approved by

24 July 2001

Executive 

Direc



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07764-01

    Original file (07764-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on IO October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board concluded CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. ROBERT D....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03383-03

    Original file (03383-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 19 October 2001 is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02072-01

    Original file (02072-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the AME rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03717-01

    Original file (03717-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone HM rating (NEC 8485). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The 2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01261-00

    Original file (01261-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be filed enclosure (1) with this corrected to show that the 24 month extension executed on 9 September 1997 be declared null and void. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04599-01

    Original file (04599-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his EAOS as 28 July 2000, with an SEAOS of 28 July 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00513-01

    Original file (00513-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the corrected to establish entitlement to a zone DT rating (NEC 8708). Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03257-01

    Original file (03257-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment and execute an extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Milner, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07856-98

    Original file (07856-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a duplicate extension. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Kastner, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 April 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04068-01

    Original file (04068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone GSE rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was discharged...