DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 4005-01
19 September 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 September 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 15 January 1992 a medical evaluation recommended that
On 28 July
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 1991 at
age 18.
you be discharged due to a bilateral knee condition.
1992 you were honorably discharged by reason of a physical
disability that existed prior to enlistment.
were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3P.
At the time you
The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most
favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for
individuals discharged due to a physical condition existing prior
to enlistment.
or injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04170-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. authorized by regulation, than others in your situation, The reenlistment code may be waived and enlistment Since you have the least restrictive code and a need exists for an individual and have been treated no differently the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13
Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10846-07
On 3 April 1993 you were honorably discharged by reason of a physical disability which existed prior to your enlistment in the Navy. authorized if you can As indicated, the record shows that you had a seizure disorder and were properly discharged from the Navy. Since you were properly discharged and have received the least restrictive reenlistment code authorized by the regulations the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-3P reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01948-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02039-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the most favorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. questioned the authority of seniors all of which were inconsistent On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code. While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05199-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03570-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08283-01
You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief of Naval Personnel) be changed. - physical disability) and a medical waiver, you could A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 December 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...