Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05066-02
Original file (05066-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JRE
Docket No: 5066-02
14 November 2002

This is in reference   to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you served in the Navy from 15 March
you were discharged by reason of unsuitability due to a personality disorder.
disorder is considered a condition, not a disability, which may render a service member
unsuitable for service, rather than unfit by reason of physical disability.
As you have not
demonstrated that you suffered from a more severe mental disorder which was incurred in or
aggravated by your service, and rendered you unfit for duty, the Board was unable to
recommend any corrective action in your case.
Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  1968 to 24 July 1970, when

A personality

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

In this regard, it is

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01675-01

    Original file (01675-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    that you seek treatment for the post traumatic stress disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs following your separation. You were discharged from the Navy on 16 April 1992 by reason of CONDITIONS You underwent a pre-separation physical - PERSONALITY DISORDERS ”. “OTHER PHYSICAL/MENTAL In his opinion, He also recommended The fact that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder during your naval service was not considered probative of the existence of material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04274-02

    Original file (04274-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental or physical disorder which was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of service, and rendered you unfit by reason of physical disability, as opposed to unsuitable for service, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01803-11

    Original file (01803-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13150-09

    Original file (13150-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02188-04

    Original file (02188-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JRE Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consistedof your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policiesAfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11027-08

    Original file (11027-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2008. Upon completion of the evaluation, you were given a diagnosis of a personality disorder, and recommended for administrative discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02012-02

    Original file (02012-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. You were discharged by reason of unsuitability/personality disorder on 19 October 1979. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10576-08

    Original file (10576-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06336-01

    Original file (06336-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07469-09

    Original file (07469-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 1 April 2010. On 28 September 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied your request for service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder, after determining that the disorder was not related to your military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...