DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 3333-01
18 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 August 1990. You underwent
psychological evaluation on 15 April 1991, and disclosed that you had never wanted to join
the Navy, and you wanted to be discharged, and that you had suffered from asthma since age
5. You were given diagnoses of situational reaction and “rule-out” personality disorder and
asthma. You underwent further evaluation on 16 May 1991, and were given a diagnosis of
personality disorder, not otherwise specified, with borderline and immature traits. On 6 June
1991, you were found physically qualified for separation. You were discharged by reason of
a personality disorder on 3 July 199
Veterans Affairs denied your requests for service connection for asthma, a mental disorder,
and conditions of your heart, back and ankles.
1. Following your discharge, the Department of
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates
thaf you were unfit to perform the duties of
your office, grade, rank or rating by reason of a physical disability which was incurred in or
aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action
in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03617-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. PHYSICAL BECAUSE OF DISABILITY. AFTER CAREFUL REVIEW OF ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE AND BASED ON UNANIMOUS OPINION OF THE HEARING PANEL, THE PHYSICAL EVALUATION BOARD FINDS THE MEMBER UNFIT FOR FULL DUTY IN THE U.S....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07584-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You denied a history of asthma and shortness of breath, but disclosed that you had been treated for pneumonia.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07327-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06749-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01947-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A reentry code of RE-4 is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to individuals separated due to personality disorders, especially if they are deemed to constitute a threat to themselves or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02904-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive un 3 October 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02989-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you underwent a pre-separation physical examination on 10 November 1999. You...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08242-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2005. The Board found the determination of a Department of Veterans Affairs psychiatrist that you did not meet the diagnostic criteria for a personality disorder on 31 January 2005 insufficient to establish that you did not suffer from a personality disorder prior to your discharge from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01372-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the diagnosed made in your case and your discharge from the Marine Corps were erroneous, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability incurred in or aggravated by your service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...