DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
Y
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH : ddj
Docket No: 2914-01
19 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 June 2001.
Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1000 MMEA of 1 June 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
DEPARTMENT OF THE
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103
NAVY
<
IN REPLY REFER TO:
0
100
MMEA
I
0
JUN
2001
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
NO 02914-01 CASE OF GYSGT
USMC
We have carefully reviewed Gunnery Sergeant
1.
to have his reenlistment date backdated in order to be eligible
for payment of a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
request
Gunnery Sergeant
2 .
7 November 1997.
Active Service (EAS) should have been 7 November 2001.
his EAS incorrectly appeared in the Marine Corps Total Force
System (MCTFS) and on his Military Identification Card as 18
February 2002 rather than 7 November 2001.
reenlisted for four years effective
Based on the four year reenlistment, his End of
However,
Sergean
Gunnery
3 .
reflected in MCTFS
checked into his dut
Gunnery Sergeant
reenlistment earlier had he realized the
checking into his unit in early 2001.
station in early 2001.
ID card was incorrect until
Furthermore
claims he would have submitted for
asserts he was unaware the
EAS
erroneous'EAS prior to
We do not recommend Gunnery Sergeants
4.
date be backdated to 7 November 2000, nor do we recommend he
receive SRB payment.
his EAS was his alone.
opportunity to correct his EAS during th
not.
ineligible for SRB.
By his own failure to correct his EAS he rendered himself
The responsibility
Gunnery Sergeant
e correctness of
had ample
ur years but did
reenlistment
5 .
Point of contact is
Capt'lll_at (703) 784-9238.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00004-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The actual reenlistment request for 36 months supports these documents as well.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07570-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. is the payment method that was in effect at the time of Corporal ,w reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_54_01 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Therefore, Warrant Officer Colemon did not warrant Marines in receipt of permanent change Staff Sergeant Lamie, the Marine 3. asserts was given preferential treatment, was approved for early reenlistment because he was complying with orders to recruiting duty. reenlistment in 1991. meet the requirements for an early reenlistment and his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 16_58_29 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Therefore, Warrant Officer Colemon did not warrant Marines in receipt of permanent change Staff Sergeant Lamie, the Marine 3. asserts was given preferential treatment, was approved for early reenlistment because he was complying with orders to recruiting duty. reenlistment in 1991. meet the requirements for an early reenlistment and his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08183-00
Your request to change your sergeant date of rank to 9 October 1998 was not considered, as the Marine Corps Total Force System already reflects that date. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, they sa 9 his date of rank is MCRC; that MCRC set his date of rank as 1 Jan 95; and that unless BCNR rules otherwise, MMPR-2...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08296-01
This is supported by your having been selected by the CY 2001 promotion board, which considered you before the MCTFS had been corrected. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. BRIAN J. GEORGE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775 .2 q r/L 3 IN REPLY REFER TO 107 0 JAM2A MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02936-07
2936-07 2 July 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01607-07
On April 15, 2005, Petitioner, through counsel, submitted an application to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) seeking removal of the January 1, 2001 to July 7,2Docket No. 01607-072001 fitness report, removal of naval records pertaining to the NJP and a remedial promotion board See enclosure (4)g. Petitioner’s request was bifurcated. Here, Petitioner did not take any action to have his fitness report removed until 15 April 2005, well after the dates of the Selection Boards...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04108-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. aim that "By doctor's orders Subj: SE OF GUNNERY SMC SERGEAN d. Gunnery Sergeant was required to be notified by MC0 6100.10. her commander that she has been assigned to the weight control program per Documented evidence enclosed in her application, the CO, Headquarters and Service Battalion letter 6100/l B 07-03 dated...