Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03055-03
Original file (03055-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVYANNEX 

WASHINGTON  DC  20370-5100 

CRS 
Docket No:  3055-03 
4 August 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United 
States Code section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 30 July 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 24 
August 1950.  You served in Korea during the Korean Conflict.  On 
29 February 1952 you received an honorable discharge by  reason of 
expiration of term of service.  On 10 December 2002 the 
Department of Veterans Affairs reviewed your records for 
frostbite to the hands and feet. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found insufficient evidence to support your 
claim of frostbite for an award of the Purple Heart.  The Purple 
Heart is only authorized for members who are wounded or injured 
as a direct result of action by  an enemy of the United States. 
Since there is no evidence of such a wound or injury in your 
record, you are not entitled to the Purple Heart.  Accordingly, 
your application has been denied.  The names and votes of the 
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 

Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice.' 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01944-03

    Original file (01944-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04368-02

    Original file (04368-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, there is no indication that anyone aboard BETELGEUSE was wounded or injured during the incident of 6 or 7 April 1945. The foregoing is very significant since it tends to show that you were not injured or wounded as you contend or, even if you were, the injury was so minor that it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02801-00

    Original file (02801-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 3 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations considered your Your allegations of error and After careful and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06183-01

    Original file (06183-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. YOU are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07371-09

    Original file (07371-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 20 August 2009. In this regard, the Board carefully considered your contentions and the statements you submitted in support of your application, but found those matters insufficient to demonstrate that you were wounded in 1944 under circumstances that would entitle you to the Purple Heart. Consequently, when applying.for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05157-99

    Original file (05157-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2000. Documentary ‘material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were wounded in action on 26 December 1968, and awarded the Purple Heart on 5 January 1969.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01354-07

    Original file (01354-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08148-02

    Original file (08148-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JRE Docket No. 08148-02 6 Mav 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr, naval record pursuant to the provisions of title United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction \)f Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2003.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00797-03

    Original file (00797-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01876-00

    Original file (01876-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your brother's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...