DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TRG
Docket No:
21 January 2003
6285-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 January 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 17 February 1993 and served
continuously until your discharge.
The record shows that on 5
March 1997 you received nonjudicial punishment for disobedience
and leaving your appointed place of duty.
counseled on two occasions concerning a substantiated incident of
child neglect and for having personal relations with a student.
Subsequently, you were promoted to sergeant and in the fitness
report for the period 8 May 1999 to 31 March 2000 you were
recommended for promotion.
Additionally, you were
In an endorsement to your request for reenlistment the commanding
officer recommended that you not be reenlisted because of your
lack of judgment, inconsistent performance, lack of desire, and
because you wanted to reenlist for the wrong reasons.
After
review, Headquarters Marine Corps denied your reenlistment and
directed one half separation pay and an RR-4 reenlistment code
because of the NJP and adverse counseling entries.
You were
honorably discharged with an
2000.
RX-4 reenlistment code on 6 November
You desire a change in the reenlistment code so that you can
again serve as a Marine.
submitted a letter from a first sergeant who states that you
performed in an excellent manner while you were attached to the
Second Battalion, Eighth Marines.
In support of your request, you have
The Commandant of the Marine Corps is authorized to grant or deny
Given your disciplinary and
an individual's request to reenlist.
counseling record, the Board concluded that there was no abuse of
discretion when your request for reenlistment was denied and an
RE-4 reenlistment code was directed.
better reenlistment code, your reenlistment would still have to
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
be approved.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Further, even if you had a
The
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
correction#of an official naval
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03622-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that a record that included two nonjudicial punishments and several counseling entries was sufficient to support the denial of your request for reenlistment, and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00385-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. HQMC denied your request for a change in the In addition, the Board noted that four of The The Board concluded that the foregoing record was sufficient to support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03119-01
1 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: SE OF STAFF SERGEAN Staff Sergeant 1. has been reviewed concerning his request for removal of the Administrative Remarks (1070) NAVMC 000714 and CMC letter of selection from the 2000 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, from his service records. 118(11) page 11 entry dated 1450/5 MMPR-2 dated 22 Aug 2000, revocation application with supporting documents MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06187-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 and 31 March 2000, copies of which are attached. Branch (RAM-5) reenlisted Staff Sergeant Marine Corps Reserve at the rank of staff sergeant with his enlistment date (980218) as his date of rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09442-02
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Apparently, your record has been corrected to reflect this At that time, you had completed almost four years of About a year later, you received RE-3C reenlistment code may be However, the decision On 7 October 1998 you were The punishment imposed whether or not to grant a waiver is a matter within the sole discretion of recruiting authorities. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07392-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. : Enclosure Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director c DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104 To: IN REPLY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06696-02
Although the enlisted performance board initially recommended discharge, this decision was changed after you submitted evidence that you had met the weight standards. The fitness report for the period 13 September 1986 to 14 February 1987 states as follows:(He) is leaving the Marine Corps after nineteen years of dedicated service, including an extended tour in the Republic of Vietnam. Consequently, the Board concluded that a correction to your record to show that you retired from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04790-03
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PEW), dated 2 June 2003, a copy of which is attached. (6), concerning section A, item 8b (physical fitness test (PFT)) of the fitness report form, says "Use code 'NMED' [not medically qualified] if the MRO warine reported on] is unable to take or pass the PFT because of a physical (medical) condition." The "NMED" entry in Item 8b of the fitness report, whi.ch is further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10767-08
oe A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2009. You did not complete any Reserve drilis or active duty service after that date. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 4 April 2000 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for one day of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded restriction for two months and a forfeiture of $2,556, all of which was suspended for six months. ...