Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01636-00
Original file (01636-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TRG
Docket No: 1636-00
8 August 2000

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 August 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Subsequently, you injured your knee

The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 20
December 1993 for 4 years.
and were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of
On 24 July 1996, the Physical Evaluation
physical disability.
Board rated your disability at 10% and directed your discharge
due to the physical disability.
31 July 1996 and were paid disability severance pay in the amount
The record shows that you were assigned an RE-3P
of 
reenlistment code.

$16,570.80.

You were honorably discharged on

You state in your application that your knee has healed and you
desire to reenlist.
a letter from a doctor who states that your knee is normal.

In support of your case, you have submitted

Regulations only allow for the assignment of an RE-3P or an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a
physical disability.
can demonstrate that the physical problem no longer exists. An
RE-4 reenlistment code means that you are not eligible for
reenlistment.

An RE-3P reenlistment may be waived, if you

Since you have been assigned the least restrictive code
authorized by regulations,
injustice in the assignment of the RE-3P reenlistment code.

the Board could not find an error or

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04887-02

    Original file (04887-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. the code would not alter the fact that you were discharged by reason of physical disability, and that you would still need a waiver in order to reenlist. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01447-01

    Original file (01447-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have submitted documentation showing that your knee You state that the commanding officer agreed with You believe an The Board noted that there is no documentation in the record to support your contentions concerning the nonjudicial punishment and the punishment imposed. punishment, for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02165-00

    Original file (02165-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LeBlanc reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, RE-3P. (e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06935-10

    Original file (06935-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2011. The diagnosis of your knee condition was changed to chondromalacia patella (CMP), and you were recommended for discharge because knee pain which interfered with your ability to perform your duties as a recruit. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13

    Original file (NR2431-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04005-01

    Original file (04005-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At the time you The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a physical condition existing prior to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01563-09

    Original file (01563-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That code should not preclude your reentry into the Armed Forces as it may be waived, particularly in a case such as yours, where you no longer experience disabling shortness of breath. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02039-00

    Original file (02039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the most favorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00435-09

    Original file (00435-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    States Code, section 1552. a ‘ A three-member panel of: the Board for Correction of. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support” thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the.burden'is:on the applicant to demonstrate the © 0 © existence’:of.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01

    Original file (03484-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. questioned the authority of seniors all of which were inconsistent On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code. While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines...