DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TJR
Docket No: 5022-01
14 November 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 12 January 1999 at
Your record reflects that on 19 January 1999,
the age of 18.
after undergoing a mental health evaluation while in recruit
training, you were diagnosed with an antisocial personality
disorder and recommended for an expeditious administrative
separation.
The evaluation report noted, in part, as follows:
She reports numerous arrests
Her most recent incident of fighting and
(Member's) history demonstrated conduct disorder in
childhood and adolescence.
since 8th grade to include: 2 assault and 3 disorderly
conduct.
subsequent arrest occurred in February 1998 in which she
"broke a girl's jaw."
(Member) endorses a chronic pattern
of impulsivity, irritability and aggressiveness, consistent
irresponsibility, and lack of remorse and indifference to
She reports frequent episodes of anger
having hurt others.
dyscontrol as evidenced by frequent fighting and disregard
for others.
Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation
by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed
On 28 January 1999 you were separated from
personality disorder.
the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason
of erroneous enlistment,
and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment
code.
However, the Board concluded these
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity.
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
reenlistment code.
antisocial personality disorder was sufficient to support the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
normally assigned when individuals are separated prior to
completion of recruit training by reason of erroneous enlistment
due a diagnosed personality disorder.
circumstances of your case,
reenlistment code was proper and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The Board concluded that the diagnosed
Further, such a code is
the Board concluded the assigned
Given all the
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08697-01
A three-member panel of the Board for CorrectLon of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00781
ND02-00781 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020509, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I was diagnosed with an Anti-Social Disorder which specifically states there must be a pervasive pattern or disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age fifteen years as indicated by three or more of the following (1) Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-01
Your reported history suggested a You were diagnosed with an mala- self- On 25 February 1999 you received a general discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality disorder, reenlistment code. The discharge processing documentation is not and were assigned an RE-4 The Board also noted that the Navy views The Board noted the statement in support of your Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02949-01
You state but you asserted that you Subsequently, the Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals, discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09769-05
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 September 2005 at age 19. Based on your actions while in recruit training, the history you provided, and the psychological testing, you were diagnosed with a narcissistic personality disorder with antisocial traits.Consequently you were processed for an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03288-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were so separated on 4 On 1 November 1999 you were processed for an In connection with this processing, You state in your application that you had personal problems and lied to the psychologist about your preservice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04796-01
(Member) reported heavy Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the diagnosed paranoid personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03498-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were referred to the On 15 July 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the personality disorder....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 09116-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.ou enlisted in the Navy ~n 20 September 1999 at age 20. The Board noted that applicable regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01982-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were processed for an In connection with this At that time you were not recommended for On 12 September pro&ssing, You state in your application that you do not deserve the RE-4 reenlistment code because you were only...