Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02344-07
Original file (02344-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O370-5 100



 S MW
Docket No: 2344-07
 1 November 2007







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
On 2 September 2004, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. On 13 July 2005, you had nonjudicial punishment for an unauthorized absence. Based on the information currently contained in your record, it appears that your commanding officer initiated administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder. In connection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and given an opportunity to submit a statement. Apparently, the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder. On 19 July 2005, you were honorably discharged by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder. At that time, you were assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code, which means you had a Condition which was not a physical disability that interfered with the performance of your duty.


Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a personality disorder. An RE-3G reenlistment code is not considered derogatory and armed
 forces may consider a waiver for individuals with such a reenlistment code. Given the reason for discharge and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-3G reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether the reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may apply to the NDRB by submitting the enclosed DD Form 293 to the address set forth on the form.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
         Executive Director



 Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02344-07

    Original file (02344-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02571-08

    Original file (02571-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, regulations authorize assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code to service members who are discharged due to a personality disorder and such a code is not considered derogatory. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08546-08

    Original file (08546-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code to service members who are discharged due to other physical/mental condition due to a personality disorder, and it is not considered derogatory. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09956-07

    Original file (09956-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears you remained on active duty until you were discharged under honorable condition for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, and assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07925-08

    Original file (07925-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01

    Original file (03484-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. questioned the authority of seniors all of which were inconsistent On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code. While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05357-02

    Original file (05357-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations state that an individual will normally receive an entry level separation during the first 180 days of continuous active military service or the first 180 days after a service break of more than 92 days of active service. You received an RE-3G reenlistment code, which is the most...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08782-09

    Original file (08782-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this regard, you were assigned the least stigmatizing reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13

    Original file (NR5410 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07446-98

    Original file (07446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 January 1992 the discharge authority directed an On 7 February 1992 you were so discharged The Board also considered your performance The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service...