DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TAL
Docket No: 084-10
12 October 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 October 2010. The names and votes o£ the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
5 July 1995 at age 19. Based on the information currently
contained in your record it appears that you were subsequently
involuntarily processed for separation by reason of a condition
not a disability. In connection with this processing, you would
have acknowledged the separation action and the discharge
authority would have approved a recommendation for separation.
The record clearly shows that on 29 May 2005, you were discharged
with an honorable characterization of service by reason of a
condition not a disability. At that time you were assigned an
RE-3G reenlistment code. In this regard, you were assigned the
most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances.
The RE-3G reenlistment code may not prohibit reenlistment, but
requires that a waiver be obtained from recruiting personnel who
are responsible for reviewing the feasibility of satisfying the
Navy’s personnel manning goals by determining whether or not an
individual meets the standards for reenlistment. If you wish to
reenlist, re-affiliate, or be reinstated in the Navy, you should
contact the Navy Recruiting Command via your nearest recruiting
facility.
The Board, in its review of your record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, overall record of service and desire to change your
RE-3G reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these
factors were not sufficient to warrant such changes because of
your condition which rendered you incapable of continued service.
gain, you were assagned the appropriate reenlistment code for
Sut situation. A@Gordingly, your application has been denied.
Meo names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
wmpon request.
Be ws" vegretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Loans
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08782-09
In this regard, you were assigned the least stigmatizing reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09186-09
In this regard, you were assigned the least stigmatizing appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08448-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3G reentry code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4526 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. At that time you were assigned an RE-3G reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07514-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service or reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05615-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05480-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11615-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16, August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material -submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13006-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.