Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08372-98
Original file (08372-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 8372-98
11 May 1999

Dear

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 11 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

852/ 125 of 16 March 1999, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

.

01/21/99

 WED 

13:05  F AX 9018712604

CNPC OOZC

MOO1

DKPARTYENT

WAVT  
5720 

 OF  THE NAVY

PERSONWPL  COMMAND

INTECRWY DRIVE

YILLIWQTOW  TN 

~8055-0000

1430
Ser 
16 Mar 99

8S2/125

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,

RECORDS

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

via:

Subj:

NPC/BCNR  COORDINATOR, NPC-OOXCB

COMMENTS AN-D RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF

Encl:

(1) BCNR file 

#08372-98

1,

Enclosure 

(1) is returned recommending disapproval.

 

m

record states he was Honorably
service
.S.  Naval Reserves 16 December 1945 as a

First Class.

There is no additional evidence in

indicating he was to be advanced to Chief

Boatswain Mate  
hi's  service record 
Boatswain Mate.

Lieutenant Commande
stated he had

2.
Retired,
Chief Boatswain Mate
been misplaced.
resented does not reflect the prospective

U;?fortunately,

an

the 

60 Chief Boatswain Mate.

,

.S.  Naval Reserve,
advancement to
perwork  may have
documentatio
advancement of

official



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04750-07

    Original file (04750-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    04750-07 9 June 2008Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06184-98

    Original file (06184-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07390-98

    Original file (07390-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06559-98

    Original file (06559-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05354-98

    Original file (05354-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08079-98

    Original file (08079-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00017-99

    Original file (00017-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00463-99

    Original file (00463-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8521144 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00593-99

    Original file (00593-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00837-01

    Original file (00837-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached In addition, the Board considered the advisory 852/369 of 2 May 2001, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...