Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06296-01
Original file (06296-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

ELP
Docket No. 6296-01
17 January 2002

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
16 January 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

considered your application on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

preoccupation with a romantic
You

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 October 1998
for four years at age 19.
The record reflects that on 8 March
1999 you were voluntarily admitted to a naval hospital for a
psychiatric evaluation to rule out suicidal ideation.
You
reported academic difficulties,
entanglement, and a desire for discharge from the Navy.
stated that on the day of admission you had been "chewed out" by
your academic advisor.
Afterwards, you began to consider a drug
overdose sufficient to achieve disenrollment from school. A
psychiatric admission followed after you disclosed your thoughts
to a class advisor.
You told the examining psychiatrist that
prior to enlistment you attempted suicide by hanging in April
1998 and described a history of troubled interpersonal
relationships, rage attacks and fights during which you became
violent.
brother in the abdomen with a stick which broke off and required
You were diagnosed with a personality disorder, not
surgery.
otherwise specified with borderline features.
The examining
psychiatrist stated that one prior potentially lethal suicide
attempt made you an ongoing risk for further acts of self-harm if
retained.

You claimed that on one occasion, you stabbed your

Administrative separation was recommended.

On 15 March 1999 you were notified that administrative separation
action was being initiated by reason of fraudulent entry and
You were advised of your procedural
personality disorder.
rights, declined to consult with legal counsel or submit a
statement in own behalf, and waived the right to have your case
reviewed by the general court-martial convening authority.
Thereafter, the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized
entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry and per-
You were discharged on 16 March 1999 by
sonality disorder.
reason of fraudulent entry and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment
code.

Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
to individuals discharged by reason of fraudulent entry.
Further, the Navy views with grave concern individuals who
threaten suicide or entertain thoughts of such action since they
pose a potential risk for harm to themselves and others if
retained.
separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no
The
error or injustice in your assignment reenlistment code.
Board concluded that the reenlistment code was proper and no
change is warranted.

Since you were treated no differently than others

The Board did not consider changing the reason for your discharge
since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by
That board
first petitioning the Naval Discharge Review Board.
is authorized to change both the reason for discharge and the
characterization of service.
reenlistment code.
to that board.

Enclosed is a DD Form 293 used for applying

However, it cannot change a

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that a

You are entitled to have

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04975-01

    Original file (04975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    you were recommended for an Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board, in its review of your entire naval record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, prior service in the Marine Corps, and your contention that a therapist found little or no evidence of the diagnosed personality disorder. Further, the Board noted that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10257-07

    Original file (10257-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 December 2004 at age 19. After review, the discharge authority...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01

    Original file (00151-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01

    Original file (03886-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501213

    Original file (ND0501213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested that her characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the attached letter: “To whom it may concern: I, C_ M_ H_(Applicant) (social security number deleted) , respectfully request to have my RE code changed from a RE-4 to a RE- 1. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07033-98

    Original file (07033-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - The evaluation refers to the members medical record which documents that he was admitted to a Navy psychiatry ward in September 1990 for suicidal ideation and notes his endorsement of a pre-enlistment psychiatric admission for a self-inflicted knife wound to his chest and abdomen in the context of suicidality, which he denied during his pre-enlistment evaluation. A review of his service record indicates the following: -The member received counseling for alcohol-related incidents. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01

    Original file (02732-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09500-02

    Original file (09500-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 January 2001 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of fraudulent entry due to the diagnosed PTSD and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00999-05

    Original file (00999-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It rejected the unsubstantiated opinion of your forensic psychiatrist that you lacked mental responsibility when you committed the offense that resulted in your discharge, as well as when you requested discharge in lieu of trial by general court-martial for desertion and disobedience of an order.The Board did not concur with the conclusion of the designees of the Specialty Leader for Psychiatry that your mental disorder was aggravated by your naval service. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...