DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 1609-98
21 May 1999
Dear
ihis is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, section 1552.
application for correction of your
provisions of title 10 of the United
Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 May 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 31 December
1998, a copy of which is enclosed.
In this connection, the Board substantially
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion to
the effect that you were properly discharged because of
pregnancy/childbirth, which is considered to be for the
convenience of the government.
When an individual is discharged
due to the convenience of the government, at least 30 months of a
four year enlistment must be completed in order to qualify for
benefits under the Montgomery G. I. Bill.
less than a year, you are not entitled to those benefits.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Since you served for
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosur
e
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
Mll.LlNCTON TN
28055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
1000
NPC-312/13
DEC 1998
p
'!
'8
From:
To:
Via:
Subj:
Commander Navy Personnel Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
Executive Director,
Assistant for Board for Correction of Naval Records Matters
(Pers-OOZ)
NION IN CASE OF
USN,
Ref:
(a) BCNR
ltr of 9 Nov 98
We have reviewed reference (a)
1.
narrative reason
for*separation of
It is our opinion that the
pregnancy/childbirth is correct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06026-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to \\pregnancy or childbirth." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03266-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500911
The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed “From Convenience of the Government to Hardship.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01949-01
On 16 October 1995 you were honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. You did not provide the second page You were not An RE-3B means the individual was discharged for Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of pregnancy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09832-07
The portion of the MGIB agreement as it applies to your application states that you had to serve on active duty for a period of 36 months in order to be eligible and the benefit had to be used within 10 years. Since you do not meet the time in service requirement and your separation was clearly voluntary, the Board concluded that you are not entitled to MGIB benefits and a correction to your record is not warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05368-00
The documentation to support the discharge processing and the quality of your performance and conduct have not been filed in your service record. On 9 December 1999 you You were honorably In the absence of any other documentation, the Board concluded that the comments in the DONCAF letter were sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00927
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-EN3, USN Docket No. Applicant transferred to another division within NETC, Newport, RI.961220: Applicant discharged with an Honorable by reason of convenience of the government due to "pregnancy or childbirth", having completing 4 years of active duty obligation. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00947
ND01-00947 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010717, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, she was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "In September 1999, AA (Applicant) requested separation from the navy due to parenthood;...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1908 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction: of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00931-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. honorable discharge from the Marine Corps Reserve and were recommended for reenlistment. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in Accordingly, your application has been your reenlistment code.