DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 3264-98
30 March 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1000
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
NPC/312/13 of 9 February 1999, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to
keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
MAW
PLusoWWEL COMMAND
5720
INTEDRITY DRIVE
YILLINDTON TN
28055-0000
1000
NPC
9 FEB
312/13
1999’
DD Form 215 has been issued correcting your DD Form
Attach this document to the original
Dear.
The enclosed
214 dated 18 January 1972.
copy of your DD Form 214.
You enlisted in the United States Naval Reserves on 6 March 1970.
You were on ACDUTRA from 19 May 1970 through
Then you were called on active duty from 7 January 1971 through 18
January 1972 at which time you were discharged.
from 6 March 1970 thru 18 May 1970 is not creditable for active
your total active duty time is 1 year and 6
duty.
months.
6 November 1970.
Therefore,
The time frame
Sincerely
Supv Military
Information Assistance Branch
Personnel
Technician
DD Form 215
Enclosure: 1.
copy to:
Board for Correction of Naval Record
Bureau of Naval Personnel (Pers OOZ)
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06087-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01609-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 31 December 1998, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08353-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC letter 1000 attached. Records show that you entered the United States on 1980 in Honolulu, Hawaii, from March 1980 till the time you reported for active duty.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07040-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2812-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1000 PERS-312/06 dtd 13 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire | record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00792-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5861 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 28 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR5861-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8246 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 17 January 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1081 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of 2 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3936 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC memo 1780 PERS-312 of 12 Sep 14, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.