Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05619-99
Original file (05619-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5619-99
19 January 2000

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

’s naval record

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 January 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER 
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

852/383  of 8 December 1999, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

,

It is regretted that the circumstances of the case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAVY  PERSONNEL COMMAND
IWTEORITY  DRIVE
MILLINDTON  TN 3805 S-0000

5710  

143 0
Ser 
8 

Dee 99

852/x83

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF

Encl:

(1) Docket 

#05619-99

1.

Enclosure  (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

2.
There is no evidence i
to indicate that he was ad
However, the information provided does indicate Mr. Nelson
completed his Navy Training
Chief Signalman on 4 

May 1944.

s service record
r First Class.

t Class and

,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07542-98

    Original file (07542-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum which is attached. Consequently, to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. School for rating conversion may participate in advancement examinations for their present rating, if otherwise qualified, until the class convening date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02707-99

    Original file (02707-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Feb 13 10_07_59 CST 2001

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER 852/303 of 13 September 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00463-99

    Original file (00463-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8521144 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08372-98

    Original file (08372-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser is attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 852/ 125 of 16 March 1999, a copy of which After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00593-99

    Original file (00593-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00080-99

    Original file (00080-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00017-99

    Original file (00017-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808627

    Original file (NC9808627.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1430 Ser 852/210 of 10 June 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05354-98

    Original file (05354-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.