DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 5501-98
26 May 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval
States Code section 1552.
record"pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 May 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record shows that you received nonjudicial
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 27 September
1993 at age 20.
punishment on two occasions.
offenses are not available.
the period 16 July 1997 to 26 February 1998, you were assigned an
adverse mark of 1.0 in leadership and were not recommended for
retention in the Navy.
"adjustment to the standards of the Naval Service has been
inadequate toward retention."
on 26 February 1998 with your service characterized as honorable.
At that time you were not recommended for retention and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
However, the details of your
In the performance evaluation for
The evaluation comments stated that your
You were released from active duty
The Board concluded that the two nonjudicial punishments and the
final adverse performance evaluation were sufficient to support
the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered-by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN
Executive Director
PE'EIFF'ER
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10639-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction oE Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00494-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 1998 at age 18. In the evaluation for the period ending 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07334-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that a record, which included a disciplinary action and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03438-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable mate:rial error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy for four years on 25 January 1995 at age 20. On 24 January 1999 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01447-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have submitted documentation showing that your knee You state that the commanding officer agreed with You believe an The Board noted that there is no documentation in the record to support your contentions concerning the nonjudicial punishment and the punishment imposed. punishment, for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05563-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period 16 March 1996 to 13 May 1998, you You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 April 1990 for five years and subsequently extended that enlistment on three occasions totaling 39 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07450-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1999 at age 18. You were honorably released from active duty, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03392-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. The members of the chain of command were present, made statements and were available to answer questions . He then told LT HI who then called Ms. D. The Board also considered the statement of the retired chief petty officer who stated that you were not derelict in your duties while you were treating him and that he did not see any disrespect.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01795-01
The reason for the removal of this report is In your application you are requesting reenlistment in the Marine Corps, a change in the reenlistment code, payment of full separation pay and/or early retirement from the Marine Corps. The Board can correct a record, but the decision to authorize reenlistment is solely a matter within the prerogative of the Marine Corps. The Board believed that the adverse fitness report for the period ending 1 February 1999 and the recommendation that you not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03796-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review In this military bearing/character, and Your record further reflects that you received an adverse special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16 June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal...