DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FINAL DECISION
BCMR Docket No. 2009-195
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD
The applicant asked the Board to award him a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). He
alleged that he was not counseled about his eligibility for an SRB on his 6th and 10th active duty
anniversaries, which were September 28, 2002, and September 28, 2006.
The Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard admitted that the applicant was
apparently not counseled about his SRB eligibility on his 6th or 10th anniversary but recom-
mended that the Board deny relief because the requested corrections would not be in his financial
interest. The JAG explained that members may only receive one SRB per zone, and the appli-
cant’s record shows that he has already received a Zone B SRB for a 6-year extension contract he
signed on April 10, 2003, which went into effect on September 27, 2003. Moreover, the JAG
stated that the $25,822.80 Zone B SRB that the applicant received for this extension contract—
calculated at pay grade MK2/E-5 with a multiple of 2—is greater than the sum of the Zone A and
Zone B SRBs he would have received by reenlisting on his 6th and 10th anniversaries. The JAG
noted that on his 6th anniversary, the applicant was in pay grade MK3/E-4 and had previously
obligated service through September 26, 2003, which would reduce his Zone A SRB, and on his
10th anniversary, the authorized Zone B SRB multiple for MK2s was just 0.5.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Article 3.C.7.1. of the Personnel Manual states that “[b]onus payments will be computed
by taking the authorized SRB multiple, multiplying it by the member’s monthly basic pay and
multiplying the result by the number of months of newly obligated service and dividing this fig-
ure by 12. Shown as an equation, this would be:
“SRB multiple x monthly basic pay x months newly obligated service
12”
Under ALCOAST 329/02, which was in effect on the applicant’s 6th anniversary, he was
eligible for a Zone A SRB calculated with a multiple of 2 and the basic pay of an MK3/E-4 with
over 4 years of service. (Under Article 3.C.7.1. of the Personnel Manual, SRBs are calculated on
the member’s basic pay as of the day before the date of reenlistment. Therefore, 6th anniversary
SRBs are paid at the “over 4” basic pay rate.) He could have reenlisted for 6 years (72 months),
but because his prior contract ran through September 26, 2003, his Zone A SRB would have been
based on just 60 months of newly obligated service. The “over 4” basic pay for an E-4 in Sep-
tember 2002 was $1,680.30. Therefore, the maximum Zone A SRB the applicant could have
received on his 6th anniversary was $16,803.00 ((SRB multiple 2) x ($1,680.30 monthly basic
pay) x (60 months of newly obligated service) ÷ 12). However, if the applicant had reenlisted for
6 years on his 6th anniversary, September 28, 2002, he would not have been authorized to extend
his enlistment for 6 years on April 10, 2003. Therefore, that extension contract would be voided
and the Zone B SRB he received for it would be recouped.
Under ALCOAST 283/06, which was in effect on the applicant’s 10th anniversary, he was
eligible for a Zone B SRB calculated with a multiple of 0.5 and the monthly basic pay of an
MK2/E-5 with over 8 years of service. He could have reenlisted for 6 years (72 months), but
because his 6th anniversary contract would run through September 27, 2008, his Zone B SRB
would have been based on just 48 months of newly obligated service. The “over 8” basic pay for
an E-5 in September 2006 was $2,402.10. Therefore, the maximum Zone B SRB the applicant
could have received on his 10th anniversary was $4,804.20 ((SRB multiple 0.5) x ($2,402.10
monthly basic pay) x (48 months of newly obligated service) ÷ 12). Under Article 3.C.4. of the
Personnel Manual, members may only receive one bonus per zone. Therefore, the applicant
could not receive this Zone B SRB on his 10th anniversary without having his prior, $25,822.80
Zone B SRB recouped.
Therefore, the Board agrees with the JAG that the applicant’s request should be denied
because the $25,822.80 Zone B SRB that he has already received exceeds the total amount he
would have received had he reenlisted for SRBs on his 6th and 10th anniversaries.
ORDER
The application of MK2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, for correction of his military
record is denied.
March 26, 2010
Date
Jeff M. Neurauter
Lynda K. Pilgrim
Kenneth Walton
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2009-195
of the Personnel Manual, SRBs are calculated on the member’s basic pay as of the day before the date of reenlistment. Therefore, the maximum Zone A SRB the applicant could have received on his 6th anniversary was $16,803.00 ((SRB multiple 2) x ($1,680.30 monthly basic pay) x (60 months of newly obligated service) ÷ 12). Under ALCOAST 283/06, which was in effect on the applicant’s 10th anniversary, he was eligible for a Zone B SRB calculated with a multiple of 0.5 and the monthly basic pay...
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The Coast Guard paid him the SRB based on only 11 months of newly obligated service because in February 2008, the applicant had signed a 36-month extension contract to obligate service to accept transfer orders. of the Personnel Manual, the applicant could not accept his transfer orders without signing at least a three-year extension.6 The...
The Board notes that the JAG alleged that the applicant should also have been advised of his Zone A SRB eligibility on his 6th anniversary, April 28, 2009, pursuant to Article 3.C.9. There is no Page 7 in the applicant’s record documenting SRB counseling on his 6th anniversary, but since he had already extended his enlistment through February 26, 2016, to receive a Zone B SRB and so could not reenlist for just 6 years, through April 27, 2015, to receive a Zone A SRB, he was not actually...
SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active duty service, the number of months of service newly obligated by the reenlistment or extension of enlistment contract, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills, which is reflected in the “multiple” of the SRB authorized for the member’s skill/rating, which is published in an ALCOAST. His record does not On July 1, 2007, the applicant reported for duty to Station Miami Beach, and on July 7th...
The Coast Guard erred when it counseled the applicant that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on January 31, 2002. of the Personnel Manual, which show that a member’s SRB equals his monthly basic pay, multiplied by the SRB multiple authorized under the ALCOAST in effect, multiplied the number of months of service newly obligated under the contract, and divided by 12, if the appli- cant had reenlisted for four years on this 6th anniversary...
He stated, however, that the SRB he received for signing the July 7, 2005, reenlistment contract was calculated with a multiple of 1.0. The applicant alleged that prior to signing the reenlistment contract, he contacted his servicing personnel office (SPO) regarding his bonus, and was told that he was eligible to reenlist for six years to receive a Zone B SRB calculated with a multiple of 1.5. The applicant’s record contains a Page 7 and a reenlistment contract, both dated July 7, 2005,...
This final decision, dated May 29, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a first class gunner’s mate (GM1/E-6), asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on both his sixth and tenth active duty anniversa- ries to receive Zone A and Zone B selective reenlistment bonuses (SRBs).1 The applicant alleged that on November 16, 2006, he learned from his unit’s yeoman that he had been eligible to receive...
CG | BCMR | Enlisted Performance | 2007-110
This final decision, dated November 29, 2007, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was timely advanced to the rate of machinery technician, second class (MK2/E-5) off of the advancement list in 2004 and that he reenlisted for four years on April 15, 2004, to receive an SRB under ALCOAST 182/03. of the Personnel Manual states that members with less than six years of active service will...
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. This final decision, dated April 21, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by replacing his October 1, 2002, six-year extension contract with a reenlistment contract to receive a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 in accordance with ALCOAST...
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD The Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard stated that typically when the proper personnel office receives a message about a member’s eligibility for advancement on a supplemental advancement list one month, the member’s name is added to the list the following month, and “the member is advanced the third month.” Therefore, when the applicant’s com- mand sent a message about his eligibility for advancement to an electronic address that had recently become...