Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017395
Original file (AR20100017395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/06/22	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, “I was separated under AR 635-200 in January of 2010.  The wording in this chapter states 'other physical or mental condition.'  My medical records (military) state that I suffer from a schizoid personality disorder, (see item 13).”  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 091118
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 100105   Chapter: 5-17       AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not A Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: 1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division (Rear) (Provisional), fort Bliss, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 080114    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  16 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	1  Yrs, 11 Mos, 22 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1  Yrs, 11 Mos, 22 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman   GT: 115   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  El Paso, TX
Post Service Accomplishments: None












VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 18 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an obsessive compulsive disorder and schizoid personality disorder, with a honorable discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 24 November 2009 the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge.  
       
       On 11 December 2009, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of honorable.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case.  A mental status evaluation by competent medical authority diagnosed the applicant with an obsessive compulsive disorder and a schizoid personality disorder.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other physical or mental condition not amounting to a disability, with an honorable characterization of service.  
       
       In pertinent part, AR 635-200, chapter 5-17 states, commanders may approve separation under this paragraph on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability and excluding conditions appropriate for separation processing under paragraph 5–11 or 5–13 that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty.  Included under chapter 5-17 are disorders that manifest in disturbances of perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldier’s ability to effectively perform military duties is significantly impaired. 
       
       The analyst was satisfied that all the requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3” and a reason of "Physical Condition, Not a Disability" as stipulated by Army Regulation 635-5-1, no other reason is authorized based on the diagnosis.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's re-enlistment issue and his contention that he was not properly diagnosed by the Army medical professional.  If the applicant still contends that he was improperly diagnosed and should be allowed to re-enlist he may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), utilizing the enclosed DD Form 149 regarding this matter.  A DD Form 149 may also be obtained from a Veterans' Service Organization. For re-enlistment purposes the applicant should also continue to work with his local recruiter.  Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 March 2011         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement, DD Form 214, and a memorandum from Dr. [redacted].

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA














Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100017395
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010975

    Original file (AR20060010975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011113

    Original file (20060011113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant was counseled on 20 August 2004 for his pending separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-13, for personality disorder. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action, requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired, and states that separation for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00529

    Original file (PD2009-00529.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI’s reported minimum weight was 96% of the minimum expected weight based on the minimum normal BMI and remained above 85% of the MLIC desirable weight (133.5 pounds). Other than anorexia nervosa, no other ratable mental conditions were forwarded to the PEB for adjudication by the MEB psychiatry evaluation. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr....

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-211

    Original file (2009-211.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, a cursory review of the merits of the application indicates that the Coast Guard committed an error by listing JFX (personality disorder) as the separation code, unsuitability as the narrative reason for separation, and RE-4 as the reenlistment code on the applicant’s DD214. It was error for the Coast Guard to describe the applicant’s discharge based on a diagnosis of separation anxiety disorder as a personality disorder. In light of the above findings, the Board finds that it is...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070005516

    Original file (AR20070005516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 00 Mos, 21 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing her testimony, and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070005516aC071121

    The regulation also directs that: commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. c. Response...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00621

    Original file (PD2011-00621.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “The US Air Force separated me with Severance Pay based on a 10% rating for “Anxiety Disorder." The VA reviewed the same medical records that the Air Force used. The commander’s statement noted that the CI could not perform any of his AFS duties due to mental stress yet his performance review of nearly 2 years did not reference any bizarre behavior and actually exceeded his duty expectations.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01941

    Original file (BC-2004-01941.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 9 February 2004 command-directed Mental Health Evaluation diagnosed the applicant’s conditions as alcohol abuse and personality disorder not otherwise specified with schizoid, obsessive compulsive and narcissistic personality traits, and recommended his administrative discharge for conditions that interfere with military service. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000969C070205

    Original file (20060000969C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Richard Murphy | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he was improperly discharged by reason of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 due to a personality disorder and should have been discharged by reason of physical disability. Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019988

    Original file (20120019988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 Worksheet (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * 36 pages of service medical records * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records and rating decisions CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, by reason of a physical condition, not a...