Application Receipt Date: 070419
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's DD Form 293 and attached documents.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070119
Discharge Received: Date: 070223
Chapter: 5-13 AR: 635-200
Reason: Personality Disorder
RE: SPD: JFX
Unit/Location: B Company, 319th Military Intelligence Battalion, 525th Military Intelligence Brigade, Fort Bragg, NC 28310
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB:
Current ENL Date: 050203 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 00 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 00 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 97E10 Human Intelligence Collector GT: 114 EDU: College Transcript Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
Evidence of record shows that on 21 December 2006, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a disorder of Axis I: v71.09 No Diagnosis; Axis II: 301.20 Schizoid Personality Disorder, and Axis III: None Impacting. On 19 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of schizoid personality disorder, with an honorable discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action. The applicant submitted a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. On 6 February 2007, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition is a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldier's ability to perform duty. The regulation also directs that: commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. Army policy requires the award of a fully honorable discharge in such case.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents she submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case. A report of mental status evaluation by competent medical authority diagnosed the applicant with a schizoid personality disorder and was appropriately recommended for separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of a schizoidpersonality disorder, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. The analyst was satisfied that all the requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Furthermore, if the applicant desires to reenlist, she should contact the local recruiter to determine her eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. Therefore, the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 5 November 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: ?????
Witnesses/Observers: ?????
Exhibits Submitted: ?????
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change 0 No change 0 - Character
Change 0 No change 5 - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing her testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
Case report reviewed and verified by: , Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: ?????
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070005516aC071121
The regulation also directs that: commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. c. Response...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014010
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 01 Mos, 09 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012118aC071121
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-13 (h), indicates that the service of a Soldier separated under this provision will be characterized as honorable. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017770
The regulation also directs that: commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. Board...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012118
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-13 (h), indicates that the service of a Soldier separated under this provision will be characterized as honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 2 November 2007 Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010975
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012303
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 May 2007, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a disorder of Axis I: an adjustment disorder; Axis II: deferred, and Axis III: non-contributory. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017712
The applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008134
Further review of the applicant's OMPF indicates that someone in the discharge process issued the applicant a DD Form 214, discharging him under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4, and a separation code of "JKK." On 3 October 2005, the unit commander counseled the applicant and indicated that he intended to initiate separation action under the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016807
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 February 2005, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a disorder of Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood; Axis II: Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified with Cluster B Traits. The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, diagnosed by a...