PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  General, Under Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020129

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 9, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Drug Rehabilitation Failure

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           AAM
    a.  Period entered for:  4 Years               ASR
    b.  Entry date:  991102
    c.  Age:  20 Years   DOB:  790108


    d.  Educational level:  GED


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  122                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E3
          2 Year(s)  2 Month(s)  28 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:

      Date  Offense(s)
      010904     Wrongfully use marijuana (010624-010724) (Field Grade)


7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  010904 Article 15 vacated on 011101 – failed to go
(010921).


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 29 October 2001, the unit
commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/ADAPCP declared the
applicant a rehabilitation failure.  On 20 December 2001, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol
rehabilitation failure, with a general, under honorable conditions
discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with
legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and
submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently
recommended separation from the service.  On 2 January 2002, the separation
authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization
of service of general, under honorable conditions.

      b.  On 29 January 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 2 months, and 29 days of
active military service in the period under review.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for
discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member
who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control
Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of
inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully
complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army
service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.  Army policy
states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on
the applicant’s overall record of service.  (However, an honorable
discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the
discharge process).



                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 021004.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 13 October
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses.  The Board noted that the applicant was
enrolled in the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program
(ADAPCP) and was aware of the consequences of any action which would
demonstrate any inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or
successfully complete such a program.  As a result of the applicant’s
actions and after consultation with the drug and alcohol abuse counselor,
the command declared the soldier a rehabilitation failure.  The evidence of
record establishes the fact that the applicant was properly counseled and
afforded a reasonable opportunity to overcome his problems.  The applicant,
as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug
policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a
military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a
fully honorable discharge.  Individuals are assigned RE codes based on
their service records or the reason for discharge.  The applicant was
appropriately assigned an RE code of 4 because he was separated under the
provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 9, by reason of drug rehabilitation
failure.  This Board found no bases upon which to change the applicant’s
reason for discharge because it was properly based upon his refusal to
participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program.  An
RE code of 4 indicates that the applicant was separated from his last
period of service with a disqualification which cannot be waived and he is
ineligible for reenlistment   The Board, being convinced that the reason
for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and
equitable, voted to deny relief.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2004104926                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9217
Date of Review:  041013                                   A9235
Character of Service:  GD                                 A9221
Date of Discharge:  020129                                A0100
Authority:  AR 635-200 C9
Reason:  A6900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1. LTC PROCTOR, ESMERALDA G.  Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X