Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104179
Original file (AR2004104179.doc) Auto-classification: Approved




                         PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Honorable

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  890706

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 14, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           AAM (2)     OSR
    a.  Period entered for:  3 Years               GCMDL (3)   EFMB
    b.  Entry date:  861218                        AOM
    c.  Age:  28 Years   DOB:  581114              NCOPDR
    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad                ASR
    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  104                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E5
          2 Years  6 Months  19 Days

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   See OMPF (fiche)

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:

      Date  Offense(s)
      881122     Wrongfully used marijuana (880912)(Field Grade)


7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      RA    760831     790307     Honorable
      RA    790308     830120     Honorable
      RA    830121     861217     Honorable




                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 26 January 1989, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of
misconduct—commission of a serious offense-abuse of illegal drugs
(marijuana), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was
advised of his rights.  On 27 January 1989, the applicant consulted with
legal counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action.  He
indicated that he was submitting a statement in his own behalf; however, no
statement is contained in the available records.  He also voluntarily
waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board
contingent on receiving a characterization of service no less favorable
than honorable.  On 30 January 1989, the unit commander subsequently
recommended separation from the service and waiver of further
rehabilitative efforts.  On 1 February 1989, the intermediate commanders
reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the
separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On
5 June 1989, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification to
appear before an administrative separation board.  On 8 June 1989, an
administrative separation board conducted the proceedings in the
applicant’s case.  The applicant was present with his defense counsel.
Based on its findings, the Board recommended separation with a
characterization of service of honorable.  On 27 June 1989, the separation
authority approved the Board’s findings and recommendations.  The
separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts, directed the
discharge of the applicant with a characterization of service of honorable.


      b.  On 6 July 1989, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 6 months, and 19 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 12
years, 10 months, and 6 days of total military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 040203, with no enclosures.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE
                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, DC on 20 October
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          ( X )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

        Board Issue:  (3)  The discharge is improper.

      b.  Request:  (   ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (3)  The issue is accepted.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 The Board noted that the unit commander used “Board Procedures” when
notifying the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under
the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct.  By
using “Board Procedures” the authority for approval of the applicant’s
separation rested with the General Court-Martial Convening Authority.  The
evidence of record shows that applicant’s separation action was improperly
approved at the Special Court-Martial Convening Authority level.  In view
of the foregoing, the Board determined that the discharge was improper.
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief in the form of a change
to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority.  This
action does not entail a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code.

        (1) and (2)  See Paragraph 3, below.

      b.  Equity:      The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
                   and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
                   equity to change the discharge.  The major factors upon
                   which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
                   and IV of this decisional document.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):

    Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issues is neither required nor rendered.
Further, the applicant’s record contains two properly constituted DD Form
214’s.  One for the period of service (760831-790307) and one for the
period (790308-890706).

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      (   ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      ( X ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to Secretarial Authority
           under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.

      (   ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       5         0
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:  22 October 2004

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):

           ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
            Secretarial Authority, Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
           ( X ) Other (see remarks below).

Remarks:  This action does not entail a change to the RE code.

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2004104179                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A0108
Date of Review:  041020                                   A1200
Character of Service:  HD
Date of Discharge:  890706
Authority:  AR 635-200 C14
Reason:  A6770
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  MD 5-0 A





                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr    X                       X       

    2.      Mbr    X                       X       

    3.      Mbr    X                       X       

    4.      Mbr    X                       X       

    5.      PO     X                       X       






Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090747

    Original file (2003090747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows that on 27 November 1989, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999016247

    Original file (1999016247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board found no cause for clemency and therefore voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999016247...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003088197

    Original file (2003088197.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.03. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094237

    Original file (AR2003094237.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701557

    Original file (199701557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    891208: Applicant was discharged. APPLICANT REQUESTS : Upgrade of his discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions and to change the reason for discharge to “for the good of the service.” APPLICANT CONTENDS : The applicant has submitted no issues for consideration by the Board.3. His counsel submitted a statement on his behalf, outlining his family problems and that he requested a general discharge under honorable conditions in view of his two prior periods of honorable service.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001051359

    Original file (2001051359.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 February 1993, the applicant was discharged. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to honorable and to change the narrative reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority.3. AR Number: 2001051359 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406 Date of Review: 010221 A9456 Character of Service: GD A1200 Date of Discharge: 930210 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C14 Reason: A6730 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A Name Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999024585

    Original file (AR1999024585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRAINCE Case Reviewing Official PART...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025615

    Original file (1999025615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003089972

    Original file (2003089972.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-15, AR 635-200 by reason of failure to meet body fat standards, with a characterization of service of honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003098906

    Original file (AR2003098906.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, given the time elapsed since the applicant’s discharge, the personal awards and decorations he received, and his length of service, the Board found that the characterization of service granted is now inequitable. The evidence of record shows that the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of “Misconduct – Pattern of Misconduct.” However, someone involved in the discharge process erroneously changed the...