PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Honorable

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020218

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 7, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Fraudulent Entry

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ASR
    a.  Period entered for:  6 Years
    b.  Entry date:  990409
    c.  Age:  21 Years   DOB:  771212
    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad
    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  111                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E4
          2 Years  10 Months  10 Days

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  The evidence of record shows that on 10 January 2002, the unit
commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7, AR
635-200, by reason of fraudulent entry in that the applicant attained a
fraudulent work visa, which allowed him to unlawfully enlist into the
United States Army.  On 16 January 2002, the applicant consulted with legal
counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a
statement in his own behalf.  On 16 January 2002, the unit commander
subsequently recommended separation from the service with an honorable
discharge.  On 24 January 2002, the intermediate commander reviewed the
proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action
with an honorable discharge.  The proper legal authority reviewed the
discharge action with no legal objections for continued processing.  On 25
January 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge and directed
that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of
honorable.

      b.  On 18 February 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 10 month, and 10 days of
active military service in the period under review.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter 7 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a fraudulent
entry is the procurement of an enlistment, reenlistment, or period of
active service through any deliberate material misrepresentation, omission,
or concealment of information which if known and considered by the Army at
the time of enlistment or reenlistment, might have resulted in rejection,
including all disqualifying information requiring a waiver.  This also
includes misrepresentation of intent with regard to legal custody of
children.  Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an
honorable discharge, or a general discharge, or a discharge under other
than honorable conditions.  If in an entry level status the
characterization will be uncharacterized.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, undated, with one (1) enclosure.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         (   ) Records review             ( X ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         (   )Records review              ( X ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Atlanta, GA on 20 May 2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 ( X ) Yes   (   ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     ( X ) Yes   (   ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:  NONE
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          ( X )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

        Board Issue:  (2)  The narrative reason for separation is
inequitable.

      b.  Request:  (   ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The evidence of record show that the
applicant was properly processed for separation under the provisions of
Chapter 7, AR 635-200, by reason of fraudulent entry with a
characterization of service of honorable.  The Board found no evidence of
racial discrimination on the part of the applicant’s chain of command.
Further, a change to reentry eligibility (RE) codes does not fall within
the purview of this Board.  If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should
contact the local recruiter to determine his current eligibility to
reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to
the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of
RE codes.  See response to issue (2) below.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (2)  The issue is accepted.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony.  There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infraction of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offense.  Notwithstanding the propriety
of the applicant’s discharge, the Board determined that the narrative
reason for separation is now inequitable.  The Board concluded that the
applicant’s length and quality of his service and the circumstances
surrounding his enlistment in the Army mitigated the narrative reason for
his separation.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief and
to change the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      ( X ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to Secretarial
           Authority
            under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       4         1
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:  28 May 2004

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):

           ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
            Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200.
           ( X ) Other (see remarks below).

Remarks:  This action does not entail a change to the RE code.

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003097709                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A1200
Date of Review:  040520                                   A9218
Character of Service:  HD                                 A0101
Date of Discharge:  020218
Authority:  AR 635-200 C7
Reason:  A6200
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  MD 4-1 A





                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr    X                       X       

    2.      Mbr    X                       X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr    X                       X       

    5.      PO     X                       X