PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Uncharacterized
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 940606
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: NGR 600-200, PARA 8-26u
b. Reason: Defective Enlistment Agreement
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
NONE
a. Period entered for: 8 Years
b. Entry date: 930108
c. Age: 17 Years DOB: 750617
d. Educational level: 12 Years
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 97 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E1
1 Year(s) 4 Month(s) 29 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that the on 8 January 1993, Orders 5-12, DOD, MEPS, Dallas, Texas, ordered the applicant to initial active duty for training (IADT) for 9 weeks to attend basic training under the alternate split training program with a reporting date of 15 June 1993. The record contains no evidence indicating that he ever reported for IADT. On 6 July 1994, Orders 127-116, State of Texas Adjutant Generals Department, Austin Texas discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army, effective date 6 June 1994 with service uncharacterized. The record also contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26u, NGR 600-200, by reason of defective enlistment agreement with service uncharacterized. The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge are not contained in the available records.
b. On 6 June 1994, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 4 months, and 29 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National Guard. Paragraph 8-26u of that regulation provides in pertinent part for the separation of soldiers by reason of defective enlistment agreement (includes soldiers unable to attend IADT within the maximum time frames).
SECTION B-APPLICANTS SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicants DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 011212.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 20 February 2002
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the available records for the period of enlistment under review. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) for a period of 9 weeks to complete basic training under the alternate (split) training program. The record contains no evidence that the applicant ever reported for IADT. Although, the applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army; the applicants record does contain a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). That NGB Form 22 indicates that the applicant was discharged, in absentia, under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26u, NGR 600-200, by reason of a defective enlistment agreement with service uncharacterized. Paragraph 8-26u, provides in pertinent part for the separation of soldiers by reason of defective enlistment agreement which includes soldiers unable to attend IADT within the maximum time frames. In view of the foregoing, and barring evidence to the contrary, the Board determined that the applicant was in an entry-level status (ELS) at the time of his discharge and consequently his service was uncharacterized. A general discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The Board determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
GERARD W. SCHWARTZ
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2002066542 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217
Date of Review: 020220 A0143
Character of Service: EL A0113
Date of Discharge: 940606
Authority: NGR 600-200 C8
Reason: A0600
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998014371
The Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to return former service members to active duty. The Board may only change the characterization or reason for discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | ar20050000676
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge IADT 990608 990828 NA PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National Guard. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000287
On 12 November 1998, the State of New Jersey, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Trenton, New Jersey, Orders 316-003, discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as a reserve of the Army, effective 26 November 1997, with an uncharacterized discharge. Remarks: The Board directs that the applicant’s discharge order from the Reserve of the Army be changed to reflect a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003098586
The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8- 27g, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.” In the absence of information to the contrary, the Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003097378
This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the Board presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003092992
The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), indicating discharge under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of under other than honorable conditions, and a RE code 3. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. However, the Board directs that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700421
Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA CASE NO: AD97-00421 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote 1. ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000050448
The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) which shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-26f, with an uncharacterized discharge, by reason of failing to meet medical procurement standards. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. EXHIBITS: A - Application for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094687
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003096759
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participant, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 135-91 states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed...