DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Army Discharge Review Board
1901 South Bell Street
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
30 September 2005
Office of the President
The Army Discharge Review Board reviewed your case and determined
that relief was warranted as indicated on the enclosed OSA Form 172, Case
Report and Directive. Accordingly, your case has been referred through the
National Guard Bureau to the Adjutant General, State of Florida,
recommending a change to your discharge.
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not
responsive to the issues raised, or does not otherwise agree with the
decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a
complaint in accordance with Enclosure 5 of that directive. You should
read Enclosure 5 of that directive before submitting a complaint. The
complaint procedure does not permit you to challenge the merits of the
decision, but is designed solely to ensure that the decisional document
meets applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may
obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA Review Boards
Agency, Attention: (Reading Room), The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-
1809.
Should you have any questions relating to the documentation
implementing the Board's decision, you should contact the Adjutant General,
State of Florida, P.O. Box 1008, St. Augustine, Florida 32085-1008.
Sincerely,
Robert L. House
Colonel, U.S. Army
President
Enclosure
MILITARY REVIEW BOARDS
Case Report & Directive
PART I - IDENTIFICATION DATA
NAME: . ADDRESS
PHONE:
COUNSEL: ADDRESS:
PHONE:
ALTERNATE PERSON(S) TO BE NOTIFIED: ADDRESS:
RELATIONSHIP: PHONE:
TYPE REPORT:
( X ) Original
( ) Addendum
REMARKS
Case Management Data
( ) Response to other correspondence required upon completion of case.
( ) DD Form 149 in file. Send case to ABCMR.
OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 22 May 98 Cover Sheet
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Uncharacterized
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 020301
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: NGR 600-200, Chapter 8, 26b (3)
b. Reason: Failure to meet medical procurement standards
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
NONE
a. Period entered for: 8 Years
b. Entry date: 990210
c. Age: 17 Years DOB: 810921
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 96 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E3
3 Year(s) 0 Month(s) 22 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
IADT 990608 990828 NA
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge
are not contained in the available records. Evidence of record shows that
on 7 March 2002, Department of the Army and the Air Force, Florida National
Guard, Office of the Adjutant General, St. Francis Barracks, P. O. Box
1008, St. Augustine, Florida, Orders P066-050, discharged the applicant
from the Army National Guard and the Reserve of the Army, effective 1 March
2002. The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of
Separation and Record of Service). It indicates that the applicant was
discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26b(3), NGR 600-200, with a
characterization of service of uncharacterized, and a RE Code of 3.
b. On 1 March 2002, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years and 22 days of military
service in the period
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: National Guard
Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures
covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Chapter
8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and
separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National
Guard. Paragraph 8-26b(3) of that regulation provides in pertinent part
that individuals can be separated for failure to meet medical procurement
standards prior to entry on IADT.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 050105, with multiple enclosure(s).
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 28 September
2005
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service is inequitable.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) See Paragraph 3, below.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
available record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
NGR 600-200, Paragraph 8-26b(3), in pertinent part, provides that
individuals can be separated for failure to meet medical procurement
standards prior to entry on IADT. The evidence of record shows that the
applicant enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) and the
Reserve of the Army and, during initial active duty for training, she
either aggravated a previous injury or was diagnosed with another pre-
existing medical condition and was unable to complete her required
training. She was released from active duty for failing to meet medical
procurement fitness standards, was returned to her unit (144th Trans Co,
Marianna, FL) and, according to her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification
Record) was assigned duty in MOS 88M from 2 July 1999 until her separation
on 1 March 2002. Further, the applicant’s NGB Form 23B (Army National
Guard Retirement Points History Statement) indicates that she was in status
“B7,” an Army National Guard Unit Member on Initial Entry Training.
However, this form also indicates that she accrued 3 years and 22 days
creditable service for retired pay. Notwithstanding the propriety of the
applicant’s discharge, the Board determined that given the evidence that
the applicant was retained for over three years, was performing duty as an
88M, and was accruing creditable service for retired pay, that the
characterization of service was and is inequitable. Accordingly, the Board
recommends that the Adjutant General, State of Florida, change the
applicant’s characterization of her National Guard service to honorable and
issue a new NGB Form 22 reflecting this change. The Board directs that the
Adjutant General, State of Florida, change the applicant’s discharge order
to reflect that she was discharged as a Reserve of the Army with an
honorable discharge. The Board found that the reason for discharge was
both proper and equitable, and voted not to change it.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issues is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to NG and USAR characterization. Change
characterization of USAR service to Honorable. Recommend
changing
National Guard service to Honorable.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
Thru: Chief, National Guard Bureau Date: 30 September 2005
To: Adjutant General, State of Florida
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I recommends that the applicant be considered for a change of
his discharge by the Adjutant General, State of Florida, with issuance of a
new NGB Form 22, as follows:
( X ) Change characterization of discharge on NGB Form 22 to
Honorable.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: The Board directs the issuance a new discharge order showing
the applicant was separated as a Reserve of the Army with an
honorable discharge.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
ESMERALDA G. PROCTOR
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20050000676 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 050928 A9218
Character of Service: EL A0101
Date of Discharge: 020301
Authority: NGR 600-200 C8
Reason: A2900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040004733
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. However, while the applicant’s discharge order and discharge certificate reflect the approved characterization and reason for separation, the Board noted that the Automated Separation Document in Lieu of NGB Form 22 indicates that the applicant was discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. Minority views: NONE PART VII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016068
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26b(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of failure to meet medical procurement standards, with service uncharacterized. For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003091266
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), indicating discharge under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26e(2)(a), NGR 600-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of general, under honorable conditions,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003095524
However, the Board directs that the applicant’s discharge order from the Reserve of the Army, issued by the State of Arizona, be changed to reflect a characterization of service of honorable. Remarks: This action entails a change to the applicant’s discharge from the Reserve of the Army to reflect an Honorable characterization of service. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070004844
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: Thru: Chief, National Guard Bureau Date: 29 October 2007 To: Adjutant General, State of Florida The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005352
Facts and Circumstances: On 13 May 2005, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was disenrolled as a cadet from the ROTC program. Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. The NGB Form 22 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26b(1), NGR 600-200, by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001245
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020715 Chapter: 8-26b(3) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Failure to Meet Medical Procurement Standards RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: HHC 213rd Areas SPT GP, Allentown, PA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040007485
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Accordingly, the Board directs that the applicant’s discharge order from the Reserve of the Army be changed to reflect that he was discharged with an honorable characterization of service. Remarks: The Board directs the issuance of a new discharge order indicating that the applicant was separated from the Reserve of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000050448
The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) which shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-26f, with an uncharacterized discharge, by reason of failing to meet medical procurement standards. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. EXHIBITS: A - Application for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094687
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...