Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002065
Original file (20150002065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150002065 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Honorable Discharge Certificate be corrected to show his rank as specialist four (SP4) instead of private first class (PFC).

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows his rank as a SP4; however, his discharge certificate shows his rank as PFC.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 September 1977 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his one-station unit training as a hawk missile crewman at Fort Bliss, Texas and was transferred to Korea.

3.  He completed his tour in Korea and was transferred to Fort Riley, Kansas on 18 January 1979 where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of SP4 on 12 September 1980.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his statutory service obligation.

4.  On 20 November 1981, he was transferred to a USAR troop program unit in Horsham, Pennsylvania.  On 8 October 1982 he was reduced to the pay grade of E-3 (PFC) due to unsatisfactory participation by Orders 10/234 issued by Headquarters, 79th U.S. Army Reserve Command.  On 9 October 1982, he was transferred back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) by Orders 10/325 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command.

5.  On 6 June 1983, he was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of PFC.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his discharge certificate should be corrected to show he was discharged in the rank of SP4 has been noted and found to lack merit.  While the applicant was REFRAD in the rank of SP4, he was transferred to the USAR to complete his statutory military obligation and was subsequently reduced to the rank of PFC for unsatisfactory performance.  There is no record to show he was advanced to the rank of SP4 after his reduction while in the USAR.

2.  Therefore, he was properly discharged from the USAR in the rank of PFC and there is no error or injustice to correct.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002065



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002065



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019214

    Original file (20110019214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 March 1980, Headquarters, First U.S. Army published Orders 55-45 reassigning him from his TPU, the 338th General Hospital, back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) as an unsatisfactory participant. On 26 February 1982, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Administrative Center, St. Louis, MO, published Orders 02-1010029 ordering his honorable discharge from the USAR effective 1 March 1982 by reason of having completed his military service obligation. He held the rank/grade of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012591

    Original file (20110012591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS), in pay grade E-1, on 28 October 1965. There is no evidence in his records to show he was again promoted to CPL, pay grade E-4, prior to his REFRAD. He was discharged from the USAR, in the rank of PFC, pay grade E-3, on 27 October 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018676

    Original file (20100018676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 November 1994, he was honorably REFRAD in the rank and pay grade of SP4/E4 due to completion of required service. Likewise, given the absence of any evidence to show that he was ever reduced to the pay grade of E-3, it is reasonable to presume that the rank on his Honorable Discharge Certificate was simply an administrative error. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009280

    Original file (20090009280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's military records show that he served in the Regular Army from 26 October 1961 to 23 October 1964 until he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009829

    Original file (20130009829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/ E-4. Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous Active Duty Training (ADT), Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. The available evidence shows he was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 31 January 1983 during his Reserve service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013205

    Original file (20090013205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's DD Form 214 issued on 20 July 1990 shows his correct rank, pay grade, DOR, and MOSC. Thus, the evidence of record indicates the applicant's discharge orders show the incorrect rank; however, the MOSC is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, ARPC-PAT-R(N1), Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012417

    Original file (20110012417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 723rd Maintenance Battalion, Unit Orders Number 76, dated 21 October 1968, appointed the applicant to the temporary grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4. There are no orders or any other document that shows he was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006100

    Original file (20140006100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It is acknowledged the order, dated 22 February 1970, that released the applicant from active duty on that date indicates his rank was SP4. However, there is no evidence of record that shows he was promoted to SP4 (E-4).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024066

    Original file (20100024066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 1351-2, dated 22 April 1982, as provided by the applicant, indicates his pay grade at the time was E-4. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant held the rank of SP4 and pay grade E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show in item 4a and 4b his rank and pay grade as SP4 and E-4,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020048

    Original file (20140020048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 January 1988, the OKARNG published Orders 19-14 discharging the applicant from the OKARNG with an under honorable conditions discharge, effective 8 February 1988 and transferring him to the USAR Control Group (IRR), in accordance with paragraph 8-27g of NGR 600-200. On 5 August 1989, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 377th Infantry Regiment, published Orders 08-01 reducing the applicant from SP4/E-4 to private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 5 August 1989 in accordance with Army Regulation...