Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012591
Original file (20110012591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110012591 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests restoration of his rank and pay grade of corporal (CPL)/E-4.

2.  He states that he was reduced from the rank of CPL to private first class (PFC) after receiving an Article 15 for no reason.  He was the only returnee from Vietnam in the unit.  The company’s policy was that a Soldier would be given the day off on their birthday and he took the day off on his birthday.  When he returned to the unit he was charged with being absent without leave (AWOL) and reduced in rank.  He was promoted to CPL in Vietnam.  He deserves to keep his rank because he fought for this country and earned all of his ranks.

3.  He provides no additional evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS), in pay grade E-1, on 28 October 1965.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery Basic).  

3.  He was promoted to the rank of CPL (temporary), pay grade E-4, on 1 November 1966.  He served in Vietnam from 28 May 1966 through 8 May 1967.

4.  On 6 September 1967, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for being AWOL from 2 to 5 September 1967.  On 7 September 1967, he was reduced to PFC, pay 
grade E-3, as a result.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in pay grade E-3, on 27 October 1967, at the expiration of his term of service (ETS), and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).  He was credited with completion of 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of net active service and time lost on 5 September 1967.

6.  Items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 lists CPL and E-3.  Item 6 (Date of Rank) lists 7 September 1967.

7.  There is no evidence in his records to show he was again promoted to CPL, pay grade E-4, prior to his REFRAD.

8.  He was discharged from the USAR, in the rank of PFC, pay grade E-3, on 27 October 1971.

9.  He enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-3 on 17 June 1977.  He was promoted to rank of specialist four (SP4), pay grade E-4 on 11 January 1978.  He reenlisted in the USAR, in pay grade E-4, on 20 May 1978.

10.  On 12 December 1980, he was reduced from SP4 to PFC, effective 12 September 1980, for unsatisfactory participation.  He was released from his Reserve unit and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  He was honorably discharged from the USAR, in pay grade E-3, on 19 May 1981.


11.  There is no evidence in his records to show he was again promoted to pay grade E-4, prior to his discharge from the USAR.

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided instructions for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated that items 5a, 5b, and 6 would list the rank, pay grade, and effective date of pay grade for the current pay grade.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the AUS on 25 October 1966 and was promoted to the rank of CPL (T) on 1 November 1966. As a result of NJP for being AWOL (a 4-day AWOL, not a 1-day AWOL) he was reduced to the rank of PFC on 7 September 1967.  He was honorably REFRAD on 27 October 1967 for ETS.  He was issued a DD Form 214 showing his rank and pay grade as PFC/E-3.

2.  He enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-3 on 17 June 1977 and was promoted to SP4, pay grade E-4, on 11 January 1978.  He reenlisted in the USAR on 20 May 1978.  He was reduced to PFC on 12 September 1980 for unsatisfactory participation.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR in pay grade E-3 on 19 May 1981.

3.  There is no evidence of record and he provided none to show he was again promoted to pay grade E-4 and served satisfactorily in that grade prior to his REFRAD on 27 October 1967 and discharge from the USAR on 19 May 1981.  

4.  After considering the evidence of record and his statements, he has not provided clear and convincing evidence that the punishments and reductions to pay grade E-3 was unjust, in whole, or in part, to support his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  __X______  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012591





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012591



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016246

    Original file (20130016246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, since there is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a permanent recommended promotion list prior to his release from active duty on 22 July 1969, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request for a promotion to E-5. His service record is void of evidence which shows he was promoted to the permanent rank of SP4/E-4 prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834

    Original file (20110001834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019085

    Original file (20100019085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and that he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 29 (Qualification in Arms)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010275

    Original file (20080010275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he is providing a certified copy of a BSM certificate that confirms he received this award while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and is requesting to be awarded the CIB based on his qualifying infantry combat service in the RVN. The applicant's record contains Headquarters, United States Army Personnel Center, Oakland, California, Special Orders Number 338, dated 3 December 1968, which directed his relief from active duty (REFRAD) and transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000933

    Original file (20140000933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held the permanent rank of PFC at the time of separation and the temporary rank of SP4/E-4. Unfortunately, there is no evidence in his records and he provides none of such promise. It is possible he performed the duties of a CPL during the stated period; however, in the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence confirming appointment or promotion to CPL, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show the rank he held on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015217

    Original file (20140015217.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as that of SP5/E-5. He responded and provided a copy of SO Number 292 (his separation orders), issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Dix, on 19 October 1967 listing his rank as "SP5." Although his record is void of any orders promoting him to SP5/E-5 while on active duty, his DA Form 20 and a USAAC Form 368 shows that he was promoted to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 effective 25 September 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000715

    Original file (20120000715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He was drafted and he was inducted into the AUS on 19 July 1966 * He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) a few days later, but his DD Form 214 only shows his RA service * He thinks he should have received the Army Good Conduct Medal * He should have been promoted to E-5 because he was in an E-5 position for which he was trained and experienced for several months 3. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023196

    Original file (20110023196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2962 (Security Termination Statement and Debriefing Certificate), dated 20 September 1967; DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated September 1967; and U.S. Army Accessions Command Form 170 (Army Reserve Personnel Data Review), dated 26 March 1968; all show his grade of SP4/E-4 lined through and entered by hand as SGT/E-5. The applicant requests his rank be corrected to show SGT on his DD Form 214. Therefore, the DA Form 2496 which shows he was recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012364

    Original file (20120012364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence. On 4 May 1967, while in training at Fort Gordon, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 30 April to 3 May 1967. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 16 January 1967 to 20 January 1970.