Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013205
Original file (20090013205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013205 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct rank and military occupational specialty (MOS) at the time of his discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was promoted to grade E-4 while serving with the 21st Field Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri; he was an E-4 when he was discharged; and his MOS Code (MOSC) was 91A1, not 91B1.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 March 1987 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 July 1987.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools), in pertinent part, that he completed the 10-week Medical Specialist course (MOSC 91A) in 1988;

   b.  item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), in pertinent part, that he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 with a date of rank (DOR) of
21 September 1989.  This item also shows he was reduced to private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 with a DOR of 2 March 1990; and

   c.  item 38 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, that he served in duty MOSC 91A1P (Medical Specialist) with the U.S. Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, from 1 March 1988 through 19 July 1990.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he entered active duty this period on 21 July 1987.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 20 July 1990 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.  At the time he had completed 3 years of net active service.  It also shows in:

	a.  item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "PFC"; item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry "E-3"; and item 12 (Record of Service), block h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry "90 03 02" (i.e., 2 March 1990); and

	b.  item 11 (Primary Specialty) shows MOSC 91A1P (Medical Specialist).

5.  A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 26 December 1991, issued by the Adjutant of Headquarters, 21st General Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, shows the applicant was advanced to SP4 (E-4), effective 31 December 1991, and that his advancement was made in primary MOS (PMOS) 91B1O.

6.  Headquarters, 102nd U.S. Army Reserve Command, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders 113-011, dated 8 August 1992, show the applicant was reassigned from the 21st General Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, to Company A, 1st Battalion, 318th Infantry Regiment, Charlottesville, Virginia, on 8 August 1992.  The orders show, in pertinent part, his rank was "SP4" and his MOSC was "91B1O.”




7.  The applicant's DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record), dated
13 August 1992, shows in:

   a.  Section II (Service Date), item 2 (Grade/Grade Armed Services), in pertinent part, the entry "SP4" and in item 3 (Date of Rank) the entry “911231"
(i.e., 31 December 1991); and in

   b.  Section III (Qualification Data), item 1 (PMOSD [Designator]), the entry "91B1O."
   
8.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, ARPC-PAT-R(N1), Orders D-03-522937, dated 7 March 1995, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 7 March 1995.  The Standard Name Line of the orders, in pertinent part, shows the applicant's rank as "PFC" and MOSC as "91B1."

9.  There is no evidence the applicant was reduced in rank subsequent to
31 December 1991 and prior to the date he was discharged from the USAR.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that the rank and MOSC shown on his discharge orders should be corrected.

2.  Records show the applicant was REFRAD on 20 July 1990.  At the time he held the rank of PFC/E-3 with a DOR of 2 March 1990 and MOSC of 91A1P.
The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's DD Form 214 issued on 20 July 1990 shows his correct rank, pay grade, DOR, and MOSC. 

3.  Records show the applicant was advanced to SP4/E-4 with a DOR of
31 December 1991 and also awarded PMOS 91B1O.

4.  The applicant's discharge orders show he was discharged from the USAR on 7 March 1995 in the rank of PFC in MOSC 91B1.  Thus, the evidence of record indicates the applicant's discharge orders show the incorrect rank; however, the MOSC is correct.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records by amending his discharge orders to show he was discharged in the rank of SP4.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, ARPC-PAT-R(N1), Orders D-03-522937, dated 7 March 1995, to show the applicant's rank at the time of his discharge on 7 March 1995 was "SP4."

2.  As a result of this correction, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command,
St. Louis, Missouri, should also issue the applicant a corrected DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate).

3.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to his PMOS.  




      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013205



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013205



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014160

    Original file (20090014160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document also shows the applicant's rank was SP4. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD in the rank of SP4/E-4 with a DOR of 9 July 1972 because he held that rank when he was separated from active duty and also at the time he was discharged from the USAR. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the correct rank, grade, and DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007171

    Original file (20070007171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of US Army Military Personnel Center Orders 7-146; US Army Military Personnel Center Appointment authorization, dated 25 June 1987; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 13-45, dated 16 January 1990; US Army Reserve Personnel Command Orders C-04-009719, dated 30 April 1990; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003198

    Original file (20080003198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no Special Orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record further shows that, during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant was issued an order awarding him an MOS that indicates he was appointed in a higher grade. In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020155

    Original file (20090020155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 2 March 1992 was specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant contends that the rank of PFC (E-3) and RE Code of "RE-3C" shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he held the rank of SPC (E-4) at the time of his voluntary separation under the 1990 Early Transition Program and he should not be penalized with the RE code that he was issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was reduced in rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010596

    Original file (20110010596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He is entitled to have item 11 of his DD Form 214 corrected to show he held and served in this MOS 1 year and 8 months. He is entitled to have item 11 of his DD Form 214 corrected to show he held and served in this MOS 6 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 11 of his DD Form 214 the entries "92A5M Automated Logistical - 26 Years 8 Months//92Y5M Unit Supply Specialist - 8 Years 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007135

    Original file (20070007135.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect: a. correction of her date of rank (DOR) for appointment as a Major (MAJ/O-4), Army Chaplain Corps (CH), to account for her prior US Army Reserve (USAR) promotion to MAJ on 2 October 1997; and b. correction of her DOR to Lieutenant Colonel (LTC/O-5) to 2 October 2004. The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007587C070205

    Original file (20060007587C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 15 February 1968, to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 13A1O and that he served in Vietnam. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968, should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017179

    Original file (20090017179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 11 (Primary Specialty) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 July 1991. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. Since the applicant was promoted to sergeant and awarded PMOS 91P2O after her release from active duty on 20 July 1991, there is no basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000889C070206

    Original file (20050000889C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DOR should be 31 October 1984, that his total prior Reserve service should be 10 years, that his total service for pay should be 17 years, that his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and date awarded should be "95B20" 9 May 1972, that his highest level of education is 2 years college, Associate of Arts Degree, and that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one bronze service star. The evidence shows that the applicant served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000889C070206

    Original file (20050000889C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DOR should be 31 October 1984, that his total prior Reserve service should be 10 years, that his total service for pay should be 17 years, that his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and date awarded should be "95B20" 9 May 1972, that his highest level of education is 2 years college, Associate of Arts Degree, and that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one bronze service star. The evidence shows that the applicant served...