Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018676
Original file (20100018676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018676 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate in the rank of Specialist Four (SP4). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of SP4; however, his discharge certificate reflects that he was discharged in the rank of private first class (PFC). 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his discharge certificate and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service, he enlisted in the Regular Army in Charlotte, North Carolina in the pay grade of E-3 on 20 November 1990 for a period of 
4 years and training as an infantryman.  He completed his training and he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 8 October 1994.

3.  On 19 November 1994, he was honorably REFRAD in the rank and pay grade of SP4/E4 due to completion of required service.  He had completed 4 years of total active service and he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).

4.  On 24 January 1996, he was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate reflecting that he was honorably discharged in the rank of PFC.

5.  A review of his official records failed to show he was ever reduced from the pay grade of E-4.  In fact most of his records reflect that he was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 8 August 1990.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Given that the applicant was advanced to the rank of SP4 about a month before his REFRAD, it is reasonable to presume that his records were not properly posted before being transferred to the USAR.

2.  Likewise, given the absence of any evidence to show that he was ever reduced to the pay grade of E-3, it is reasonable to presume that the rank on his Honorable Discharge Certificate was simply an administrative error.

3.  Accordingly, it would be appropriate to issue him an Honorable Discharge Certificate in the rank of SP4 to replace the Honorable Discharge Certificate issued on 24 January 1996 in the rank of PFC.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing him an Honorable Discharge Certificate in the rank of SP4 to replace the Honorable Discharge Certificate in the rank of PFC issued to him on 24 January 1996.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018676



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018676



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013205

    Original file (20090013205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's DD Form 214 issued on 20 July 1990 shows his correct rank, pay grade, DOR, and MOSC. Thus, the evidence of record indicates the applicant's discharge orders show the incorrect rank; however, the MOSC is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, ARPC-PAT-R(N1), Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023248

    Original file (20110023248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record contains no evidence and the applicant has failed to provide independent evidence that shows he was ever recommended for or promoted to SP4/E-4 by proper authority while serving on active duty. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006454

    Original file (20090006454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 August 2008, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) denied the applicant’s request for advancement on the Retired List. The applicant’s claim that he should be advanced on the Retired List to his highest grade held of SSG/E-6 because of his excellent service subsequent to the incident that resulted in his reduction to the lower grade which includes him being awarded the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, and the 5th award of the Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022040

    Original file (20120022040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 August 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120022040 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms he held the rank and grade of PFC/E-3, and that he completed a total of 3 years of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007104

    Original file (20080007104.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD indicates that the last letter of his first name was an “A” and that his rank was PFC/E-3 with a date of rank of 25 July 1969. On 1 November 1973, the applicant was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate which indicates that the last letter of his first name contains an “A” and that he was discharged in the rank of “PFC.” DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013415

    Original file (20110013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 at the time of his release from active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he held the rank of SP4/E-4 at the time of REFRAD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004644

    Original file (20120004644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he was promoted back to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 between the date of his reduction and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015829

    Original file (20110015829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of specialist E-4. The applicant states that his discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) incorrectly reflect that he was discharged from the USAR in the rank and pay grade of Private First Class (PFC) E-3. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014171

    Original file (20080014171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 12 January 1970 in support of his application. The evidence of record shows that Special Orders advanced the applicant to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3, effective 22 November 1968. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s REFRAD orders indicate his rank was SP4.